LL
Mainstream TV attempts to cater for anyone aged from 18 to 118, so why shouldn't it also include the under 18's and be 1 to 118 instead? Compete against them, don't give up.
Children are catered for with family formats. In this multi-channel environment, it's a waste of resources to once again schedule children's programmes in kids peak-time when they'll just watch the tightly targeted kids channels or The Chase/Tipping Point anyway.
London Lite
Founding member
I don't see the point. Kids have their own section on Freeview, Sky, Virgin etc where they can watch wall to wall shows to their hearts content, or stream content. Pre-schoolers will have parents leaving the tv on CBeebies or Nick Jr. all day.
The days of kids watching a block of programming on weekday mid-afternoons and weekend mornings are long gone. It's been in the making for the last thirty years. Even in the 90s, CBBC on One and CITV were competing against Nickelodeon and Cartoon Network .
The days of kids watching a block of programming on weekday mid-afternoons and weekend mornings are long gone. It's been in the making for the last thirty years. Even in the 90s, CBBC on One and CITV were competing against Nickelodeon and Cartoon Network .
Mainstream TV attempts to cater for anyone aged from 18 to 118, so why shouldn't it also include the under 18's and be 1 to 118 instead? Compete against them, don't give up.
Children are catered for with family formats. In this multi-channel environment, it's a waste of resources to once again schedule children's programmes in kids peak-time when they'll just watch the tightly targeted kids channels or The Chase/Tipping Point anyway.