NG
http://home.vis-is.co.uk/data/grabs/law-gfx.jpg
Edit: someone needs to buy annabel an iPad so she can get rid of the mountain of paper on the desk.
I may be wrong - but I think that that may be the world dirty feed which broadcasters who don't do their own graphics take?
I'd imagine there are also court feeds with the same graphics as the BBC but without the BBC Sport logo. (I assume each court has at least three main outputs : BBC Dirty, World Dirty and World Clean? I may be wrong though - assumptions are dangerous things!)
Similarly whoever is doing the wimbledon.com presentation operation presumably has access to a graphics box with the same artwork? (AIUI there is a Wimbledon 'world feed' which broadcasters who don't have an on-site presence can take - and I think that is produced by someone like IMG?)
noggin
Founding member
It's clear that they have access to the native feed and are using the same graphics style as the BBC do for their own 'channel' purposes.
http://home.vis-is.co.uk/data/grabs/law-gfx.jpg
Edit: someone needs to buy annabel an iPad so she can get rid of the mountain of paper on the desk.
I may be wrong - but I think that that may be the world dirty feed which broadcasters who don't do their own graphics take?
I'd imagine there are also court feeds with the same graphics as the BBC but without the BBC Sport logo. (I assume each court has at least three main outputs : BBC Dirty, World Dirty and World Clean? I may be wrong though - assumptions are dangerous things!)
Similarly whoever is doing the wimbledon.com presentation operation presumably has access to a graphics box with the same artwork? (AIUI there is a Wimbledon 'world feed' which broadcasters who don't have an on-site presence can take - and I think that is produced by someone like IMG?)