GS
Why not? There's no doubt I watch more "Dave" than "UKTVG2". It was a risky rebrand and it succeded. You have to applaud that.
As for the rest, well, the branding is a mish-mash to me. I tend to say "UK Gold" and "UKTV Drama". The mistake was to tweak "UK" to "UKTV". It never really rolled off the tongue.
They have an opportunity to pull the channels together under a more consistant family brand, whilst keeping their genres distinct. That could be as simple as a common element in their presentation,
Gavin Scott
Founding member
Inflatable Dartboard posted:
So would I
I think they really have just let the whole "Dave" thing go to their heads.
Why not? There's no doubt I watch more "Dave" than "UKTVG2". It was a risky rebrand and it succeded. You have to applaud that.
As for the rest, well, the branding is a mish-mash to me. I tend to say "UK Gold" and "UKTV Drama". The mistake was to tweak "UK" to "UKTV". It never really rolled off the tongue.
They have an opportunity to pull the channels together under a more consistant family brand, whilst keeping their genres distinct. That could be as simple as a common element in their presentation,