BA
Not really, I just couldn't be bothered to go round the outside.
So now parts of the eye itself is semi-transparent when they shouldn't be?
I think we can all safely say that these new channels will be filled with tacky jokes about their names:
Press Release
AxG posted:
bilky asko posted:
By having a look here, it seems the Watch logo is semi-transparent.
Not really, I just couldn't be bothered to go round the outside.
So now parts of the eye itself is semi-transparent when they shouldn't be?
I think we can all safely say that these new channels will be filled with tacky jokes about their names:
Paul Moreton from The Jolly Land of TV Land posted:
“Watch couldn’t be better timed."
RO
rob
Founding member
The Factual channels are to rebrand in 2009...
http://www.digitalspy.co.uk/broadcasting/a120253/uktv-to-rebrand-factual-channels-in-2009.html
http://www.digitalspy.co.uk/broadcasting/a120253/uktv-to-rebrand-factual-channels-in-2009.html
IS
You mock but I think 'Nosh' is quite catchy and could be quite successful!
Yep, Nosh would be a good name for a TV station.
Perhaps 'Dig' for UKTV Gardens?
chris posted:
Reboot posted:
So, say hello to "Chav", "Stuff", "Then" and Nosh" then?
You mock but I think 'Nosh' is quite catchy and could be quite successful!
Yep, Nosh would be a good name for a TV station.
Perhaps 'Dig' for UKTV Gardens?
JC
http://www.broadcastnow.co.uk/images/watch_ident-2_resized_250_tcm19-1855787.jpg
Red Bee work their magic again
Red Bee work their magic again
ST
Oh dear. Out of the three "new" channels I had more hope for Watch as the original logo looked quite interesting, and there was alot they could do with it.
It's difficult to imagine what they are aiming at with their mixture of "live action and CGI" idents again, but I really wish Red Bee would change their thought processes. You only have to look at the originality of the idents for Sky 1/2/3 to see how well it can be done.
If it's an odd coloured and over-sized ball from a pool table or a bowling ball then it's misplaced. If it's an eye then it's worryingly large and very 1985-ish.
Are they planning to scare the potential viewers? "We'll know if you're not watching!"
JCB posted:
Red Bee work their magic again
Oh dear. Out of the three "new" channels I had more hope for Watch as the original logo looked quite interesting, and there was alot they could do with it.
It's difficult to imagine what they are aiming at with their mixture of "live action and CGI" idents again, but I really wish Red Bee would change their thought processes. You only have to look at the originality of the idents for Sky 1/2/3 to see how well it can be done.
If it's an odd coloured and over-sized ball from a pool table or a bowling ball then it's misplaced. If it's an eye then it's worryingly large and very 1985-ish.
Are they planning to scare the potential viewers? "We'll know if you're not watching!"