JJ
jjne
> Personnel, I think chain letters never suited peak time
I agree actually -- I am not 100% sure on this but I believe that the 1988 series with Andrew O'Connor was originally intended as a 9.25 programme (it was certainly every bit as cheap as the 1987 Beadle one) -- but the ratings had proven so high that it was "promoted" into the 7.30-up-against-Eastenders graveyard slot, where it initially did very well (this spot had been home to a range of gameshows previously, as well as "The Roxy", another, rather more ambitious TTTV production that fell foul of being up against strong competition).
Chain Letters was produced at a high rate -- AIUI an entire 40-show run would be recorded in less than three weeks, at minimal cost. The very fact that the production values were never raised says to me that this was just a cheap little show that was never really intended for prime time, and could have been pulled at any moment. So it did well to last as long as it did.
I agree actually -- I am not 100% sure on this but I believe that the 1988 series with Andrew O'Connor was originally intended as a 9.25 programme (it was certainly every bit as cheap as the 1987 Beadle one) -- but the ratings had proven so high that it was "promoted" into the 7.30-up-against-Eastenders graveyard slot, where it initially did very well (this spot had been home to a range of gameshows previously, as well as "The Roxy", another, rather more ambitious TTTV production that fell foul of being up against strong competition).
Chain Letters was produced at a high rate -- AIUI an entire 40-show run would be recorded in less than three weeks, at minimal cost. The very fact that the production values were never raised says to me that this was just a cheap little show that was never really intended for prime time, and could have been pulled at any moment. So it did well to last as long as it did.