TV Home Forum

Time Warner eyes up ITV?

(July 2005)

This site closed in March 2021 and is now a read-only archive
IS
Isonstine Founding member
Well, it's being reported and the shares have shot up...not usually smoke without fire.


Quote:
ITV shares leap on takeover talk

Chris Tryhorn, City correspondent
Monday July 4, 2005

Shares in ITV jumped today following a report that US media giant Time Warner was lining up a bid for the broadcaster.
Shares in the network rose by 10p or 8% 134.75p in early trade, a 15-month high, before slipping back to 130.25p by 10.30am.

Speculation about a takeover has been persistent since the company was launched following the merger of Granada and Carlton in February last year.

According to the latest report, in the Mail on Sunday, Time Warner is preparing a bid at 165p a share with private equity group Apax and investment bank Goldman Sachs.

The former director general of the BBC, Greg Dyke, who is an adviser to Apax, was named as a potential leader of the bid.

Many analysts remain sceptical that a bid for ITV can work financially in adding value to the £5.3bn company.

There are also doubts that new managers could match the deft political touch of the ITV chief executive, Charles Allen, who last week secured a £135m reduction in the broadcaster's analogue licence fees.

"These rumours have been going on such a long time - frankly who knows?" said Paul Richards, a media analyst at Numis Securities.

He said he felt ITV had a sound strategy in place but that an American bidder could feel there was room for improvement.

"If you look at the experience of the US networks they have done a terrific job managing decline. Perhaps they feel there's something they can bring to the ITV party."


That's from Media Guardian, and it's being reported elsewhere too - Sky interestingly ends with the line of "OFCOM is believed to be broadly sympathetic to Mr Allen's point of view." Woe betide us.

Here's some links for you to click:

BBC report
Media Guardian
From Sky
DJ
DJGM
One thing to bear in mind - Time Warner owns AOL, so make of that what you will . . .
NH
Nick Harvey Founding member
You mean that if they buy ITV, they'll make it IMPOSSIBLE to uninstall from your television?
:-(
A former member
The sooner this happens the better.
NU
The Nurse
Yeah right, no matter how bad you think things might be now, this really will spell the demise of UK telly. OFCOM have been a total waste of space from the start, they just seem to be backing anything that makes rich people richer and not giving 2 hoots about the viewer.
CW
CentralWest
Would you think that ITV would gain from a takeover, and would any extra money be pumped in? I would welcome it if the programmes would be improved as currently there is not much worth watching the ITV network for.

How soon would be this be able to happen if there was a takeover?
DJ
DJGM
CentralWest posted:

Would you think that ITV would gain from a takeover, and would any extra money be pumped in? I would welcome
it if the programmes would be improved as currently there is not much worth watching the ITV network for.

How soon would be this be able to happen if there was a takeover?


If Time Warner (owners of AOL) buy ITV, expect the station to dumbed down even more than it already is!

(If that's possible!)
CW
CentralWest
DJGM posted:
CentralWest posted:

Would you think that ITV would gain from a takeover, and would any extra money be pumped in? I would welcome
it if the programmes would be improved as currently there is not much worth watching the ITV network for.

How soon would be this be able to happen if there was a takeover?


If Time Warner (owners of AOL) buy ITV, expect the station to dumbed down even more than it already is!

(If that's possible!)


That will be a very poor network then. Surprises me that ITV can waste vasts amounts of money of 30 plus programmes that runs for a few weeks throughout daytime, yet cannot provide decent evening viewing, especially on a Saturday night.
MA
Matt Founding member
ITV cannot get any worse.

For what is fighting to be the UK's number one TV company/channel(s), it's output is shocking.
To think that tourists come and visit, tune into ITV and watch the utter tripe ITV manage to pass off as 'programming' makes me ashamed to be British.

I welcome the Americans - take it over and for god's sake make it watchable!

At least with AOLTW, there's the added bonus of Warner Brothers Films to keep us entertained. It might not seem like much, but it's a damn site better than what it's like now.
MD
Mr D'Arcy
Matt posted:
ITV cannot get any worse.

For what is fighting to be the UK's number one TV company/channel(s), it's output is shocking.
To think that tourists come and visit, tune into ITV and watch the utter tripe ITV manage to pass off as 'programming' makes me ashamed to be British.

I welcome the Americans - take it over and for god's sake make it watchable!

At least with AOLTW, there's the added bonus of Warner Brothers Films to keep us entertained. It might not seem like much, but it's a damn site better than what it's like now.


Sadly I agree that ITV can't get any worse now. More investment must mean more quality and much more choice.
:-(
A former member
Matt posted:
ITV cannot get any worse.

For what is fighting to be the UK's number one TV company/channel(s), it's output is shocking.
To think that tourists come and visit, tune into ITV and watch the utter tripe ITV manage to pass off as 'programming' makes me ashamed to be British.

I welcome the Americans - take it over and for god's sake make it watchable!

At least with AOLTW, there's the added bonus of Warner Brothers Films to keep us entertained. It might not seem like much, but it's a damn site better than what it's like now.


Hear hear.
BO
boring_user_name
Judging TimeWarner's ability to provide programming by the content broadcast by Boomerang, CNN and TCM, I welcome their takeover of ITV.
The prospect of a TimeWarner takover raises an interesting question: if the merger happened, would CNN London and ITN be integrated? I hope so; as long as CNN would take control of ITN rather than the reverse.

Newer posts