TV Home Forum

This Morning

Social distance no more thanks to clever tech. (p184) - 16/04/18 onwards

This site closed in March 2021 and is now a read-only archive
SO
Switched On
I've not howled at the TV so much in ages, the first caller did not deserve to be on air not knowing Albert Dock, Dr Chris etc Zipper


He knew Dr Chris but it was a very old pic. I didn't recognise him in it.

Also I don't think it's a good look to take a swipe at the mods in your signature for giving you a perfectly justified warning.


So do you know the caller to be able to state that for sure? He clearly didn't know very much of This Mornings history.

And thank for you for your snowflake opinion Rolling Eyes but when you have to carry the badge of 'RECENTLY WARNED' for stating a well documented fact then why should I not share that with people who may otherwise judge?
LL
Larry the Loafer
Watching on catch-up, it's so surreal to see this:

*


Half expecting to see "A Granada Production" at the end.
SP
Steve in Pudsey
Have to agree with the comment that it looked effortless, like R&J were just back after a couple of weeks off.

I'm glad that they kept the current graphics and look and feel rather than digging out the retro ones, just the occasional archive clip of the guests here and there.
London Lite and Brekkie gave kudos
BR
Brekkie
Yes, just hosting a regular show.
WH
Whataday Founding member
I've not howled at the TV so much in ages, the first caller did not deserve to be on air not knowing Albert Dock, Dr Chris etc Zipper


He knew Dr Chris but it was a very old pic. I didn't recognise him in it.

Also I don't think it's a good look to take a swipe at the mods in your signature for giving you a perfectly justified warning.


So do you know the caller to be able to state that for sure? He clearly didn't know very much of This Mornings history.

And thank for you for your snowflake opinion Rolling Eyes but when you have to carry the badge of 'RECENTLY WARNED' for stating a well documented fact then why should I not share that with people who may otherwise judge?


1. Your attitude stinks .
2. I don't know the caller but he said "Ooh it was an old picture" immediately after Richard got it right.
3. You were 'RECENTLY WARNED' for stating something which could get this website sued, which is why it's not wise to state it again in your signature.
BR
Brekkie
A great walk through of the set about 85 mins in as Richard and Judy go to interview the Pride of Britain set, passingvthe GMB set as they do.
ME
mediaman2007
Silly question - are TC2 and TC3 pretty much how they were in the BBC days? And are their entrances in the same positions? Seeing the entrance lobby to them I just can't seem to place things now.
RD
RDJ
A great walk through of the set about 85 mins in as Richard and Judy go to interview the Pride of Britain set, passingvthe GMB set as they do.


I think you can also see the Loose Women in the background prepping during the interview in the TVC foyer.

Also, Richard couldn’t help but comment on how It’s Behind You is a rip off of You Say We Pay.

Had to admire Judy’s acting skills for the woman who won £400, when on YSWP they would’ve won double that.
WH
Whataday Founding member
I do wonder if today was a test run for something more permanent. It was so low key in terms of promo.
South Today, DJ Dave and DeMarkay gave kudos
BR
Brekkie
Wasn't it a grand per correct answer on You Say We Pay, so it would have been £8000.
WH
Whataday Founding member
That was pre-phone scandal (which You Say We Pay was implicated in).
ME
mediaman2007
The empty gallery of studio 8 at TLS. Credit to https://twitter.com/Hereisdavidh/status/1187746660719497216

*

Newer posts