One hoped Schofe would leave TM this year what with it being his ten year anniversary with the programme. Nonetheless it's still trashy as ever nowadays, Eamonn Holmes seems to tame it somehow.
Eamonn pokes fun at it from within, Schofe things its innovative and revolutionary TV when its just Take a Break in TV form.
I don't recall ever hearing Schofe saying he was the next Paxman, and given his 10 years (and the rest) in non-children's television, he appears to be getting a raw deal here in terms of his interviewing credentials.
I have to say, a lot of the names circulating the net right now are probably nearer the truth than many in the establishment would like to admit (yet), so let's not take our eyes off the actual issue here.
Had the question been posed about interviewing the people accused of various scurrilous activities without the piece of paper (I.e. no one named on air, as such) there would have been the same answer and no fuss. The prop was the problem, not the query.
There's an establishment generated fizz about Schofield right now which is rather odd given the dizzying heights of political power some of the "Internet names" reached.
I think everyone needs to focus on the real issue and establish the facts in order that justice is achieved.
Any talk of Philip Schofield being "too big for his boots" is rather pathetic in comparison to the seriousness of the accusations afoot.
The issue is, he revealed the names so whether or not they are guilty, as far as the public are concerned, they are guilty. I'd expect more from someone who got their job because someone lost theirs for the same reason, and from someone who has on many occasions said that both victims and suspects should remain anonymous until proven guilty, it seems a tad hypocritical.
By all means he did have a very valid point, but the irony of the situation is, he's completely detracted from the issue by dealing with it in the way he has.