TV Home Forum

The CBBC Thread

Idents refreshed (July 2007)

This site closed in March 2021 and is now a read-only archive
BU
buster
I think Chris and London are the worst offenders really...Ed & Oucho's humour was often quite sophisticated, and Iain & Hacker have their moments. Those two really don't seem to have a lot going for them, I'm glad that kid pointed out the "silly sketches" as they're often the most cringey bit.
BA
Badger264
Its unfair to pin the blame on to any particular presenter because they're just doing their job and behaving how they producers want them to. It would be fairer to criticise them if they were allowed to present as themselves.
DB
dbl
How far the 'sketches' went in the old days..
J1
j10cool10
Its unfair to pin the blame on to any particular presenter because they're just doing their job and behaving how they producers want them to. It would be fairer to criticise them if they were allowed to present as themselves.


I agree, people say that Iain and London may not be "good presenters" but the producers see the 1000's of emails sent in by children everyday and if they weren't happy with them, they'd be gone.
BA
Badger264
Andrew and Angellica are one of the best CBBC pairings ever, I'm amazed that they were never given a Saturday morning show.
VM
VMPhil
It was great between 2002 and 2007, Ed was great but started the trend of the presenters becoming a bit more patronising and look what we've got now. What happened to the purpose built studio? It's now gone back to the broom cupboard, just a bit bigger!
WP
WillPS
Seems a bit daft, especially as Studio 9 is sat gathering dust most of the time.
DB
dbl
Iain's reaction to this is:
http://twitter.com/#!/IainDoesJokes/status/67365468184383488

Early 2000's was a low point? LOLwut?
TR
trivialmatters
I think the problem CBBC has is catering too much for the lower half of their age group. 8 year olds will happily watch programmes with 12 year olds in - it's aspirational to be a bit older and cool. 12 year olds however will not watch programmes with 8 year olds in.

By the same argument, 8 year olds will happily watch more 'serious', trendy presenters being 'cool' in a studio - but the older kids are less enthused by 'babyish' sketches in the CBBC office.

Things have changed since the CBBC channel first launched, and an enormous studio with 15 presenters on a rota just isn't viable anymore. We're lucky there's invision continuity at all, because if the BBC needed to shave a few million from the CBBC budget, it'd be the first thing to go.

I actually find some of the sketches hilarious. At times, it reminds me a lot of SMTV Live.
WP
WillPS
dbl posted:
Iain's reaction to this is:
http://twitter.com/#!/IainDoesJokes/status/67365468184383488

Early 2000's was a low point? LOLwut?
Hmmm. Well, I guess we're talking about the 15-months immediately before a rebrand.

Back then, CiTV was still a major player, with a studio and new programming, aswell as the ever-popular SMTV:Live. It just seemed that after the bugs arrived at CBBC they stopped wanting to compete, and at that point the writing was on the wall.
DO
dosxuk
I actually find some of the sketches hilarious. At times, it reminds me a lot of SMTV Live.


I don't think the older kids watched SM:TV for the sketches...
VM
VMPhil
I actually find some of the sketches hilarious. At times, it reminds me a lot of SMTV Live.


I don't think the older kids watched SM:TV for the sketches...


Laughing

The innuendo was amazing and hilarious and is why it's probably one of the most fondly remembered saturday morning "kids" shows.

Newer posts