TV Home Forum

Terry Wogan's penis

Warning: Includes caps (October 2007)

This site closed in March 2021 and is now a read-only archive
ST
Stuart
Katnap posted:
Ha, that reminds me of a story my gran told me, about a middle-aged female colleague who........

Katnap, I think that is more a tale for

http://www.rp-network.com/tvforum/uploads/mtrologo.jpg

than on here!
PT
Put The Telly On
JasonB posted:
This gives Points of View a whole new meaning! Laughing


Should be renamed Points in View
SO
Steven O
nok32uk posted:
JasonB posted:
This gives Points of View a whole new meaning! Laughing


Should be renamed Points in View


That would be the tip of the iceberg... Laughing
NJ
Neil Jones Founding member
jrothwell97 posted:
Quote:
"This was obviously done on purpose. The floor director and camerman would have nolticed this gross image immediately, but did nothing about it. BBC staff need to be reprimanded seriously over this indecency. Wogan never did answer the question from one viewer as to how a certain person could appear "LIVE" in two distinct programmes run one after the other at different venues. BBC up to its unethical tricks again. As for Wogan himself, he was past it many years ago, seems to be hanging on and on. At best he is barely tolerable. Horribly corny and with an amateurish presentation, a really uncomfortable buffoon." - Robert Ducksworth, England


Says someone, who, judging by their name, probably has a penis and may well have used it in the past, causing it to become visible to other people.


People who read and "contribute" to the Daily Mail are just generally weird. This is the right-wing newspaper that floats between tabloid fodder and broadsheet appeal. Therefore it attracts the kind of readership who think they're too good for The Sun but not posh enough for The Times. These are the people who'd love to see the BBC privatised and take every opportunity they can to push their case. From the above comment it seems they support ageism as well.

This time round the complaint is valid about Points Of View, it's become more and more of a promotional exercise in recent years and a blatant schedule filler rather than any serious attempt to do what it used to.
ST
Stuart
Neil Jones posted:
People who read and "contribute" to the Daily Mail are just generally weird .
This is the right-wing newspaper that floats between tabloid fodder and broadsheet appeal. Therefore it attracts the kind of readership who think they're too good for The Sun but not posh enough for The Times. These are the people who'd love to see the BBC privatised and take every opportunity they can to push their case. From the above comment it seems they support ageism as well.

Mr Jones, I first read the DM going to school on the train from about age 14 (as many other people did on that train). Amazingly I wasn’t any more twisted by their political sympathies than I am now some 22 years later.

Many times I also bought The Sun, which generally had the same articles, but in cartoon format.

After eventually leaving home, I would order both the NoTW and the MoS for years. The NoTW would take 20 mins to read (while eating breakfast). The MoS would take a lot longer.

You assume ro know who I have voted for, or who I will. Your current argument is based on nothing. Offer a point of view based on fact please, not presumption.
PT
Put The Telly On
Well said Mr Plymouth.

What? Yeah, occasionally I read the Daily Mail..ok?*


*it is a pathetic cross between tabloid fodder and broadsheet however
ST
Stuart
nok32uk posted:
Well said Mr Plymouth.
What? Yeah, occasionally I read the Daily Mail..ok?*
*it is a pathetic cross between tabloid fodder and broadsheet however

I hate people who presume anything.
I am the preverbial "floating voter". It is us who decide the government! Wink
RR
Ronnie Rowlands
StuartPlymouth posted:
Mr Jones, I first read the DM going to school on the train from about age 14 (as many other people did on that train). Amazingly I wasn’t any more twisted by their political sympathies than I am now some 22 years later.

Many times I also bought The Sun, which generally had the same articles, but in cartoon format.

After eventually leaving home, I would order both the NoTW and the MoS for years. The NoTW would take 20 mins to read (while eating breakfast). The MoS would take a lot longer.

You assume ro know who I have voted for, or who I will. Your current argument is based on nothing. Offer a point of view based on fact please, not presumption.


Tumbler, is that you??
ST
Stuart
Ronnie Rowlands posted:
StuartPlymouth posted:
Mr Jones,.................

Tumbler, is that you??

Consider yourself slapped across the chops for that comment.
And I've advised Ms H to do no more naked webcams with you from now on as reperation!

In other news, Mr H is not best pleased after Lorna broke her laptop again, used his mobile to contact Metro and locked it in error.....the Portuguese Police are now searching Dr McCanns car boot for the PUK Code
GB
GavBelfast
If there are Children in Need, Helen certainly isn't.

Shocked
ST
stevek
jrothwell97 posted:
StuartPlymouth posted:
stevek posted:
mr wogan esq is a human male.....

If you want to sound like an officious pedant then at least try to get someone's name correct:
Sir Michael Terence Wogan, KBE DL
(a moments research goes a long way)


This does not, however, affect the fact that he is a human male, and therefore has a penis.


exactly then point I was making Rolling Eyes
MD
Mr D'Arcy
Well now we know why the present Lady Wogan is always happy! ROFLOL!

I watched Points of View and to be honest, that would be the last place my eye would go.

Newer posts