TV Home Forum

Terry Wogan's penis

Warning: Includes caps (October 2007)

This site closed in March 2021 and is now a read-only archive
SO
Steven O
Spencer For Hire posted:
imaginativename posted:
"This was obviously done on purpose. The floor director and camerman would have nolticed this gross image immediately, but did nothing about it. BBC staff need to be reprimanded seriously over this indecency. Wogan never did answer the question from one viewer as to how a certain person could appear "LIVE" in two distinct programmes run one after the other at different venues. BBC up to its unethical tricks again. As for Wogan himself, he was past it many years ago, seems to be hanging on and on. At best he is barely tolerable. Horribly corny and with an amateurish presentation, a really uncomfortable buffoon." - Robert Ducksworth, England


Kind of sums up everything wrong with the Daily Mail and its readers, who just seem to enjoy getting outraged by anything and everything... or more often, by nothing.

As if anyone would think a glimpse of the outline of Wogan's cock might be featured deliberately. It's hardly going to be a ratings magnet is it.


I seem to remember some bright spark at Channel Five thinking that Keith Chegwin's penis would pull in ratings... Laughing
GS
Gavin Scott Founding member
Steven O posted:
Spencer For Hire posted:
imaginativename posted:
"This was obviously done on purpose. The floor director and camerman would have nolticed this gross image immediately, but did nothing about it. BBC staff need to be reprimanded seriously over this indecency. Wogan never did answer the question from one viewer as to how a certain person could appear "LIVE" in two distinct programmes run one after the other at different venues. BBC up to its unethical tricks again. As for Wogan himself, he was past it many years ago, seems to be hanging on and on. At best he is barely tolerable. Horribly corny and with an amateurish presentation, a really uncomfortable buffoon." - Robert Ducksworth, England


Kind of sums up everything wrong with the Daily Mail and its readers, who just seem to enjoy getting outraged by anything and everything... or more often, by nothing.

As if anyone would think a glimpse of the outline of Wogan's cock might be featured deliberately. It's hardly going to be a ratings magnet is it.


I seem to remember some bright spark at Channel Five thinking that Keith Chegwin's penis would pull in ratings... Laughing


The only thing the appearance of Chegger's knob did was to remind me to put button mushrooms on my shopping list.
SO
Steven O
Gavin Scott posted:
Steven O posted:
Spencer For Hire posted:
imaginativename posted:
"This was obviously done on purpose. The floor director and camerman would have nolticed this gross image immediately, but did nothing about it. BBC staff need to be reprimanded seriously over this indecency. Wogan never did answer the question from one viewer as to how a certain person could appear "LIVE" in two distinct programmes run one after the other at different venues. BBC up to its unethical tricks again. As for Wogan himself, he was past it many years ago, seems to be hanging on and on. At best he is barely tolerable. Horribly corny and with an amateurish presentation, a really uncomfortable buffoon." - Robert Ducksworth, England


Kind of sums up everything wrong with the Daily Mail and its readers, who just seem to enjoy getting outraged by anything and everything... or more often, by nothing.

As if anyone would think a glimpse of the outline of Wogan's cock might be featured deliberately. It's hardly going to be a ratings magnet is it.


I seem to remember some bright spark at Channel Five thinking that Keith Chegwin's penis would pull in ratings... Laughing


The only thing the appearance of Chegger's knob did was to remind me to put button mushrooms on my shopping list.


While a butcher's in Melrose decided to sell chipolata sausages, honouring Cheggers' appearance on Naked Jungle, when Keith and the team visited the town a few weeks later for It's A Knockout! Laughing
RM
Roger Mellie
jrothwell97 posted:
For pete's sake, he's a man! He's got a penis! It's vaguely visible in those trousers! So what!?


Laughing Try telling that to Jane MacDonald; when the photograph featured on Loose Women yesterday, she noticed straight away and got in a fluster Laughing The other ladies weren't so impressed mind...

So in the Daily Mail , how did Terry's lunchbox affect houseprices?
JR
jrothwell97
Roger Mellie posted:
jrothwell97 posted:
For pete's sake, he's a man! He's got a penis! It's vaguely visible in those trousers! So what!?


Laughing Try telling that to Jane MacDonald; when the photograph featured on Loose Women yesterday, she noticed straight away and got in a fluster Laughing The other ladies weren't so impressed mind...

So in the Daily Mail , how did Terry's lunchbox affect houseprices?


Well, you see, Wogan's privates were spotted in a toilet urinal in BBC Television Centre which had recently been refurbished for £300,000 of license fee payers' money by the company Williamson's Carpetry, which employs a person who has a friend who has a girlfriend who has a brother who has a friend who is a Polish immigrant, of which four hundred million are currently in this country buying up all our houses.

I would highly expect the Hate Mail to come up with something like that.
ST
stevek
Quote:
Both my daughter and I (who are in no way prudish) were totally embarrased to see Terry with very revealing trousers on.


no way prudish, give me a break, if you were not prudish you wouldn't be complaining you daft bat Rolling Eyes

and god forbid your daughter even finds out men have a penis I mean, she may want to have babies one day and will be emotionally destroyed to know that

mr wogan esq is a human male mammal, therefore he has a penis

just live with it
JR
jrothwell97
Quote:
"This was obviously done on purpose. The floor director and camerman would have nolticed this gross image immediately, but did nothing about it. BBC staff need to be reprimanded seriously over this indecency. Wogan never did answer the question from one viewer as to how a certain person could appear "LIVE" in two distinct programmes run one after the other at different venues. BBC up to its unethical tricks again. As for Wogan himself, he was past it many years ago, seems to be hanging on and on. At best he is barely tolerable. Horribly corny and with an amateurish presentation, a really uncomfortable buffoon." - Robert Ducksworth, England


Says someone, who, judging by their name, probably has a penis and may well have used it in the past, causing it to become visible to other people.

And anyway, the biggest buffoon around these days has to be Boris Johnson.
DA
David
Janner south west posted:
For God Sake!! All blokes have one it's nothing to get all giggly about. I can only assume the person that created this thread is a bit jealous?


I am the person who created this thread, are you suggesting I have a small penis? I would be interested to hear what you are basing that on.

BTW, there is now a video on YouTube.
*
ST
Stuart
stevek posted:
mr wogan esq is a human male.....

If you want to sound like an officious pedant then at least try to get someone's name correct:
Sir Michael Terence Wogan, KBE DL
(a moments research goes a long way)
JR
jrothwell97
StuartPlymouth posted:
stevek posted:
mr wogan esq is a human male.....

If you want to sound like an officious pedant then at least try to get someone's name correct:
Sir Michael Terence Wogan, KBE DL
(a moments research goes a long way)


This does not, however, affect the fact that he is a human male, and therefore has a penis.
JB
JasonB
This gives Points of View a whole new meaning! Laughing
KA
Katnap
stevek posted:
and god forbid your daughter even finds out men have a penis I mean, she may want to have babies one day and will be emotionally destroyed to know that


Ha, that reminds me of a story my gran told me, about a middle-aged female colleague who came into work one morning very upset because she had had the misfortune to come across a flasher on her way in. What made it even more shocking for the woman concerned was the fact that apparently she had never even seen her own husband's manhood, let alone that of a complete stranger.

Given that this was 1980-something and not 1880, the mind boggles.

Newer posts