TE
Was a bit of an eyeful in my opinion!! 
http://i160.photobucket.com/albums/t176/zukeylukey/Terry.png
They should stick to angles like this in future!
http://i160.photobucket.com/albums/t176/zukeylukey/Terry2.png
http://i160.photobucket.com/albums/t176/zukeylukey/Terry.png
They should stick to angles like this in future!
http://i160.photobucket.com/albums/t176/zukeylukey/Terry2.png
TE
But at the end of the day, he couldn't help it really could he? 
I think going as far to complain is a bit rediculous to be honest.
I think going as far to complain is a bit rediculous to be honest.
JR
For pete's sake, he's a man! He's got a penis! It's vaguely visible in those trousers! So what!?
IM
Interesting comment on the daily mail website about this:
"This was obviously done on purpose. The floor director and camerman would have nolticed this gross image immediately, but did nothing about it. BBC staff need to be reprimanded seriously over this indecency. Wogan never did answer the question from one viewer as to how a certain person could appear "LIVE" in two distinct programmes run one after the other at different venues. BBC up to its unethical tricks again. As for Wogan himself, he was past it many years ago, seems to be hanging on and on. At best he is barely tolerable. Horribly corny and with an amateurish presentation, a really uncomfortable buffoon." - Robert Ducksworth, England
And I love their irrelevant details in the report, "Terry, who earns £xxx a year..." - how is that related?!!
"This was obviously done on purpose. The floor director and camerman would have nolticed this gross image immediately, but did nothing about it. BBC staff need to be reprimanded seriously over this indecency. Wogan never did answer the question from one viewer as to how a certain person could appear "LIVE" in two distinct programmes run one after the other at different venues. BBC up to its unethical tricks again. As for Wogan himself, he was past it many years ago, seems to be hanging on and on. At best he is barely tolerable. Horribly corny and with an amateurish presentation, a really uncomfortable buffoon." - Robert Ducksworth, England
And I love their irrelevant details in the report, "Terry, who earns £xxx a year..." - how is that related?!!
PT
Never mind Terry's Todger...
If it were the likes of Jordan sporting nipple outline nobody would give a damn.
If it were the likes of Jordan sporting nipple outline nobody would give a damn.
JS
For God Sake!! All blokes have one it's nothing to get all giggly about. I can only assume the person that created this thread is a bit jealous?
GM
nodnirG kraM
Davidjb posted:
Nobody complains when watching gymnasts or olympic games on tv do they.
Now you're talking. Can be stuck to my screen for days watching that. Some say gymnastics and beach volley ball etc are team activities - I find that watching it is very much a solo event.
I'll get me coat.
SO
And what about the time that Judy Finnegan's top fell down at the National TV Awards?
It's some country that we live in if folk are getting hung up about the unintentional exposure of tits and willies on national TV.
nok32uk posted:
Never mind Terry's Todger...
If it were the likes of Jordan sporting nipple outline nobody would give a damn.
If it were the likes of Jordan sporting nipple outline nobody would give a damn.
And what about the time that Judy Finnegan's top fell down at the National TV Awards?
It's some country that we live in if folk are getting hung up about the unintentional exposure of tits and willies on national TV.
SP
Kind of sums up everything wrong with the Daily Mail and its readers, who just seem to enjoy getting outraged by anything and everything... or more often, by nothing.
As if anyone would think a glimpse of the outline of Wogan's cock might be featured deliberately. It's hardly going to be a ratings magnet is it.
Having said that... it's quite a big schlong isn't it? Who'd have thought?
imaginativename posted:
"This was obviously done on purpose. The floor director and camerman would have nolticed this gross image immediately, but did nothing about it. BBC staff need to be reprimanded seriously over this indecency. Wogan never did answer the question from one viewer as to how a certain person could appear "LIVE" in two distinct programmes run one after the other at different venues. BBC up to its unethical tricks again. As for Wogan himself, he was past it many years ago, seems to be hanging on and on. At best he is barely tolerable. Horribly corny and with an amateurish presentation, a really uncomfortable buffoon." - Robert Ducksworth, England
Kind of sums up everything wrong with the Daily Mail and its readers, who just seem to enjoy getting outraged by anything and everything... or more often, by nothing.
As if anyone would think a glimpse of the outline of Wogan's cock might be featured deliberately. It's hardly going to be a ratings magnet is it.
Having said that... it's quite a big schlong isn't it? Who'd have thought?