Could we even ultimately end up with an ITV plc style rationalisation of the sub-regions (e.g. the "Edinburgh" sub-opt being pre-recorded in Glasgow)?
Hopefully not, even when the Edinburgh opt existed pre East programme, it was always live. Can't envisage them wanting to pre-record it.
Was is irrelevant - all the ITV sub-regions were live at one time. It is obvious these decisions are about business, not money.
A shame STV2 is going but the writing has long been on the wall. Like others though don't get how That's TV can afford it and secondly why OFCOM keep turning a blind eye to their takeovers when they've failed to deliver an adequate service in every single licence area.
Do you think STV will learn lessons from STV2? I ask this because, when Sky Scottish closed, STV, or Scottish TV as it was then, said they would "learn lessons from the channel".
I still think given the prominent position on the EPG and relatively small marginal cost, they have given up on STV2 too easily. If STV wants to increase original production, then they can easily repeat them on STV2.
:-(
A former member
I wonder if this is a double bluff? STV say x y z and lots of people complain and so does the SNP government, STV pretends to back down and say Edin opt stay, but the 10.30 is record 15mins before hand in Glasgow? STV gets most of the cuts thought but others think yes there got connesisions.
I still think given the prominent position on the EPG and relatively small marginal cost, they have given up on STV2 too easily. If STV wants to increase original production, then they can easily repeat them on STV2.
There not even getting 10'000 for Taggart at 9pm, Yet the company makes 1/2 million a year on reruns from other broadcasters... local news is even worse with 4'000 and Live at 5 with 2'000, im sure but if the figures are true there no way in HELL STV2 should be kept open....
Reading the Powerpoint for the Strategy Update, Simon Pitts might just as well call it ITV and be done with it. Read as well that they will rebrand to get rid of the 'Corporate image'. I've never seen the current branding as 'corporate'.