A lot of the information is now being drip fed out on exactly what this all means. I understand That’s TV has bought all the local licenses already. Meanwhile, STV’s dedicated news output for Edinburgh and the east is being effectively axed and replaced with a 10 minute opt on the main Glasgow news show at 6pm. No news yet on what will happen to Aberdeen’s team. Some increasing grumbles from media people and politicians that this decision was taken by a CEO who’s basic salary is larger than the combined losses of STV2! Edinburgh Evening News has more on the east coast job cuts...
https://www.edinburghnews.scotsman.com/news/business/stv-to-axe-separate-edinburgh-news-bulletin-1-4740167
Ironically, That's TV with their amateur sub-standard output may provide more local news than STV2 ever did thanks to their insistence of providing a national feed where viewers in Ayr got news for Aberdeen and Dundee before their own news.
:-(
A former member
I think the viewership for Thats TV will be even lower...
Reading some commentary on Twitter it seems that activist shareholder pressure is a factor here.
I noticed that too:
There are a couple of hints in there that one driver of STV strategic review is investor pressure. Crystal Amber Fund is biggest shareholder, building to 17% - "one of the most feared activist investors" ie it demands focus on the short-term financials, and soon.
With the clearing out of a lot of non-core areas (like local TV), cutting back all the extra bits of news coverage above franchised commitments etc, and focusing the productions wing on making more content for ITV, I can't help but feel we are witnessing a small step towards ITV Scotland.
The political situation here would make that happening quite turbulent, but a simplified business might make for a more attractive purchase/sale down the road at some point.
PS - The limited "free ads fund" for Scottish businesses also seems like a bit of a sweetener to soften this news a little bit to the politicians.
A recent member of the STV news team has also posted his views on Twitter. Appears no big changes to Aberdeen news, as it's still a separate Channel 3 franchise. I suspect they wanted to avoid coming into Ofcom's glare on another front this time round.
:-(
A former member
So were be back to two then, Just Central and North. I doubt Scotland Tonight will go anywhere it ticks to many boxes..
A: When the strike happening and B: a new look come January?
Quote:
Edinburgh and the Lothians will no longer have a separate 6pm news. It will now have a 10 min opt-in (I’d assume one or two news stories plus Hibs, Hearts and Edinburgh Rugby stories) during a central belt-wide STV News at Six show broadcast from Glasgow.
A: When the strike happening and B: a new look come January?
Let’s not get ahead of ourselves, you know there would have to be a ballot etc.
Im surprised how far the cuts have gone. I can understand wishing to move with the times ie more online stuff twitter etc social media ,but the cuts just stink of of a ITV takeover at some point....
:-(
A former member
looks like a walk out has already happened this lunchtime:
STV is to close its second channel as part of a reorganisation that will result in the loss of 59 jobs.
The broadcaster said the loss-making STV2 would close at the end of June, with investment shifting to its main channel and online streaming.
While 25 jobs will go at STV2, a further 34 will also be lost as part of changes to news output.
STV said the reorganisation of services would result in savings to the company of about £2m a year.
The announcement was made as part of a three-year strategic review by new chief executive, Simon Pitts.
Douglas Fraser: Commerce trumps creativity at STV
He said there would be renewed focus on online streaming, with a new ad-free subscription version of the STV Player launched for the first time.
The company also said it planned to invest £15m in new original content over the next three years.
Mr Pitts said the decision to axe STV2 was in part driven by anticipated competition from BBC Scotland's new channel, which will begin broadcasting next year.
The announcement comes after STV revealed its pre-tax profit had slipped slightly from £18.3m in 2016 to £18m last year.
Simon Pitts spent 17 years at ITV before taking over at STV STV2 was launched in 2017, bringing together the company's local TV stations for Glasgow and Edinburgh as well as proposed local stations for Ayr, Aberdeen and Dundee.
However, over the 12-month period, the channel lost £800,000.
Mr Pitts said: "As a result of the challenging economics of local television and anticipated increased competition from BBC Scotland, we have taken the difficult decision to close our loss-making STV2 channel to focus our future content investment on STV and the STV Player." He added: "This is a positive vision for STV that will re-establish the company as a creative force in Scotland and beyond. "We will invest in creative talent, new original programming and digital to ensure STV becomes Scotland's home of news and entertainment and delivers long-term value for advertisers, shareholders and viewers alike." STV's main business is the Channel 3 service for central and northern Scotland - it is the only part of the network that is not owned by ITVplc.
The decision to close STV2 and sell the licence to local TV company That's TV was perhaps predictable. From the start, there was surprise that a major company like STV had got involved in the local television project. The local TV network across Britain was the brainchild of former culture secretary Jeremy Hunt. He hoped it would engage viewers with the kind of local issues which are not covered by major channels - for instance the detailed work of councils - and help make up for the decline of the local press. STV was the only major media company to apply for local licences and the decision did raise eyebrows. any in the established media wondered if the scheme - whatever merits it might have - was ever going to be financially viable, far less make money.
Local stations
The original vision was for local TV stations covering Glasgow, Edinburgh, Ayr, Aberdeen and Dundee - but latterly STV2 was, in effect, a Scottish national service with little truly local content.
STV2's commercial failure came despite the political support and goodwill some gave to its news programme integrating Scottish, UK and world news. Last week its magazine show Live at 5 won a prestigious industry award.
That's TV already owns a large number of the local stations south of the border. Most of the licences there are owned by either That's TV or rival Made TV. If anything, it could be even more of a challenge for That's TV to make a big impact. Its service won't have the benefit of an established brand name or promotion on a major channel. Meanwhile, there are questions over whether any new local TV licences will be advertised by regulator Ofcom.
I never thought it was a bad idea for STV to get in on the action:
Quote:
STV was the only major media company to apply for local licences and the decision did raise eyebrows.
Many in the established media wondered if the scheme - whatever merits it might have - was ever going to be financially viable, far less make money.
STV got what it wanted a chance to expand and test run other news services, I really do hope Fair city never cots more than £400'000 to get .....
Last edited by A former member on 16 May 2018 5:24pm
LS
Lou Scannon
I was half-expecting to read that STV was handing its Local TV licences back to Ofcom, and therefore the albino pachyderm that is Local TV would be put out of its misery in Scotland. Arguably, selling them to That's TV is as good as shutting them down!
As it stands, do the full 30-min Glasgow/Edinburgh STV News programmes truly stick just to news stories from their own sub-region, or do they split the difference between being partly west-focused/east-focused and partly a pan-Central Belt news agenda?
Also, does Dundee/Tayside do a 10:30pm bulletin at all, or is it literally just the sub-opt within the 6pm Aberdeen programme?
:-(
A former member
To be fair on some quiet news days it the same stories and running broad. Also 10.30 news during Scotland today is North wide is no Tayside opt.
Actully that means the late Edinburgh opt must be going aswell...
So it's going back to the way it was previously done by the East opting out for 10 minutes or so. I wonder if this is the new CEO's attempt to put his mark on things. Wonder how Rob Woodward would have went about it. One can only wonder...