TT
Well I thought Strictly Come Dancing was supposed to be a serious dance competition.
Unfortunately I only watch the main show on Saturday evening and results show on Sunday evening. I don't bother with "It Takes Two" in the week.
The last couple of weeks it appears to me as though Anton has been dragging Ann around more than her really dancing.
In some ways I think whoever from the BBC or third parties iss responsible for putting together the routine (producer, choreographer) is partly to blame. Saturday 23 October Ann "flew" into the studio on that trapeze type thing. Surely that was a superfluous stunt (nothing to do with the dance she was doing -Tango) just to make the performance more entertaining and memorable, an extra incentive for viewers to vote her back on sympathy grounds, just to have something even more amusing Saturday 30 October. Perhaps if that stunt hadn't been there, she'd have been in the bottom two with Peter & Erin.
Well I thought she was much better than Ann Widdecombe. Tina was 5th on the judges' leader board and deserved to stay another week, whereas Ann and Anton deserved to be eliminated.
Why are you bringing up about Boogie Beebies again? I don't think it's been on for a good while. It was on Good Friday some time but I don't think it's shown up since, until yesterday. Sunday evening looking through the Freeview EPG I accidentally spotted it was on CBeebies yesterday morning and this morning. The fact that I videoed just about every Boogie Beebies dance in 2007, is really nothing to do with my criticism of Strictly Come Dancing 2010.
Well I endorse what Craig Revel Horwood has said the last couple of Sunday results shows about Ann not being in the bottom two.
Sunday 24 October the bottom two were Michelle & Ian v Peter & Erin. When asked if the bottom two was the right result, Craig said “No, it’s wrong, I think Peter deserves to be in the bottom with Ann, not Michelle. I think Ann should be in the bottom two.” In my opinion, Craig was right there. Michelle should have been called out as definitely through. The bottom two should have been Ann & Anton v Peter & Erin, with Ann & Anton knocked out that week. Peter & Erin should then have gone out Sunday 31 October.
Funny you should say that since Forsyth's original vision of the show was more along the lines of the generation game rather than a serious dance show!
Well I thought Strictly Come Dancing was supposed to be a serious dance competition.
If you listened and read more carefully (HA!) you'd have heard the experts (both the judges on the show and the choreographers who do "It Takes 2") say - very clearly - that Ann manages to include a lot of the basic steps. She's clearly not the best of the bunch, but in no way as bad as John Sergeant; and the judges score her accordingly.
Unfortunately I only watch the main show on Saturday evening and results show on Sunday evening. I don't bother with "It Takes Two" in the week.
The last couple of weeks it appears to me as though Anton has been dragging Ann around more than her really dancing.
In some ways I think whoever from the BBC or third parties iss responsible for putting together the routine (producer, choreographer) is partly to blame. Saturday 23 October Ann "flew" into the studio on that trapeze type thing. Surely that was a superfluous stunt (nothing to do with the dance she was doing -Tango) just to make the performance more entertaining and memorable, an extra incentive for viewers to vote her back on sympathy grounds, just to have something even more amusing Saturday 30 October. Perhaps if that stunt hadn't been there, she'd have been in the bottom two with Peter & Erin.
Tina this week fell short - compared to her normal standard, I thought.
Well I thought she was much better than Ann Widdecombe. Tina was 5th on the judges' leader board and deserved to stay another week, whereas Ann and Anton deserved to be eliminated.
For a man who watches Boogie Beebies, a show about having fun with dance and movement, I find your comments very out of character.
Why are you bringing up about Boogie Beebies again? I don't think it's been on for a good while. It was on Good Friday some time but I don't think it's shown up since, until yesterday. Sunday evening looking through the Freeview EPG I accidentally spotted it was on CBeebies yesterday morning and this morning. The fact that I videoed just about every Boogie Beebies dance in 2007, is really nothing to do with my criticism of Strictly Come Dancing 2010.
I'm probably wasting time typing this, as you never ever take on board anyone's opinion but your own. Call me Craig Revel Horwood if you like, but you're therefore a crashing bore.
Well I endorse what Craig Revel Horwood has said the last couple of Sunday results shows about Ann not being in the bottom two.
Sunday 24 October the bottom two were Michelle & Ian v Peter & Erin. When asked if the bottom two was the right result, Craig said “No, it’s wrong, I think Peter deserves to be in the bottom with Ann, not Michelle. I think Ann should be in the bottom two.” In my opinion, Craig was right there. Michelle should have been called out as definitely through. The bottom two should have been Ann & Anton v Peter & Erin, with Ann & Anton knocked out that week. Peter & Erin should then have gone out Sunday 31 October.