Having just skimmed through last night's programme, I'm finding it all a little repetitive. So we're going to be watching Jamie's School Dinners if it all goes wrong eh? That's been told to us like it's been fresh information for three days now. Funny the first time, less so subsequently. It's like everything we've seen could've been edited down to fit a 90 minute opener or two 60 minute shows maximum and by now we should be having them in "space". The words "just get on it with it", spring to mind!
And I'm convinced I've seen Paul before - as soon as he first appeared on screen in the audition videos section on the first episode, I've been trying to think where I've seen him.
Granted he bears more than a passing resemblance to Craig winner on BB1, but I'm sure I've seen him a lot more recently than that.
This suspiction is starting to ruin what could have been a great format and show. The idea is good, but if there is one problem with it, (if it is as Endemol UK say) is that the cadets should have been kicked out of the camp every couple of days - so you see a wind-up reveal during the series, and not all on the final episode.
Having just skimmed through last night's programme, I'm finding it all a little repetitive. So we're going to be watching Jamie's School Dinners if it all goes wrong eh? That's been told to us like it's been fresh information for three days now. Funny the first time, less so subsequently. It's like everything we've seen could've been edited down to fit a 90 minute opener or two 60 minute shows maximum and by now we should be having them in "space". The words "just get on it with it", spring to mind!
Exactly what I was thinking, how many times does Johhny need to say he needs to be quiet because they are "all inside the barracks" too. It is painfully slow to watch.
Last night I was amused by the reactions of the identified actor while they were being lectured on how to communicate though.
I'm sure I've seen a couple of these people in other places too, and I too really do now wonder if the joke is on the viewers.
Here are screengrabs of the contestant who bears a striking similarity to an actor who appeared with Gordon Ramsay in a blood donation advert mentioned earlier in the thread.
How do you know that the person in the blood donor advert is an actor and not someone who really did recieve a transfusion?
I have to agree it's starting to look as if the hoax is on the viewers.
Here are screengrabs of the contestant who bears a striking similarity to an actor who appeared with Gordon Ramsay in a blood donation advert mentioned earlier in the thread.
Obviously the same person. Yet we've been told by Space Cadets that his occupation is an
electrician?
Actor, more like.
Could be that the campaign didn't use actors, or that he is a part-time actor, part-time electrician. (Many actors have to have second careers to pay their bills...)
The 'hoax on us' theory is a bit weak.
More likely, he is with an extras agency, and got a bit part in an advert.
Not exactly a job for life.
Endemol advertised in 'The Stage', some media savvy people are to be expected.
If they were using actors, would they actually use their real names? Endemol might make the lion's share of mistakes, but they have heard of the internet.
If this is what they're building up to, then the big problem is that it's just not a very good joke. The joke as we know it so far, however, is - we're watching all these people from the outset knowing that it's all a hoax and that they're going to look very silly when it's revealed to them. But if, at the end, they say "Ha! We all fooled you! The whole thing's set up and everybody is an actor!" then where's the public humiliation? Who's gonna find that funny? The producers?! Bit of an expensive production just to keep them amused!
Or do the conspiracy theorists think they're hoping to keep it all under wraps? It's very careless employing somebody who has already been on television before.
I think the producers have been taken over by ego to be honest. And that is a huge downfall. They underestimated how stupid the public are.............or maybe considering your position on the subject, maybe they did not.
The 'hoax on us' theory is a bit weak.
More likely, he is with an extras agency, and got a bit part in an advert.
Not exactly a job for life.
Endemol advertised in 'The Stage', some media savvy people are to be expected.
If they were using actors, would they actually use their real names? Endemol might make the lion's share of mistakes, but they have heard of the internet.
No, it is you who is either working for Endemol or as gullible as endemol predicted. Simple as. Check out here for the ins and outs of how this is a hoax.
Not even mentioning the bit about the girl from cruel summer 2, who has a different name on this show. They has been a sudden disapearance from google of photos from the show. There is one very quick photo i found on a blueyonder website, and also they left up a pdf of the girl from birminghams cv. Real name Katie Booth.
click for that here
Sadly photos are hard to come by. Katie is Kerry Hasset, who is also from Birmingham coincidently enough. If someone can track down the photos from Cruel Summer 2 on here, maybe we can put this to bed.
The link that you have provided in this thread as proof of how this is a hoax is inaccurate. It appears to be written by you, so i think you should note how your post on that website explains NOTHING about why this show is a hoax on the viewer.
Quote:
Also, there was never 125 eyes in the bowl like they revealed to the viewers.
There were in fact
210
.
Quote:
And in the diary room, one person farts, he was the first person to do in to the room too. I don’t see that happening.
Claims that it is very unlikely that the first person into the 'diary room' would have farted? Oh, the whole show is definately a hoax on the viewers then.
Quote:
The second person in used a far fetched quote from another contestant, again, hard to believe. To make things worse, one actor somehow managed to “kick off” the toe nail of ill bill actor Steve. He then holds his foot up to one of the cameras and shows his foot, saying something along the lines of “I might as well show you what you want to see”. It was a bit too silly for an actor because he is supposed to give the impression he is NOT an actor. I did not check to see if he had stopped limping later, but they may have thrown something in like that for good measure, but I am only guessing.
So a 'normal' person wouldn't have realised there were cameras there and that they would no doubt want a shot of his toenail hanging off??
I fail to see how or why Endemol, or in fact Zeppotron, would even want to hoax the viewers into thinking that they were playing a hoax on a group of 9 wannabes. THERE WOULD BE NO POINT WHATSOEVER.
The 'hoax on us' theory is a bit weak.
More likely, he is with an extras agency, and got a bit part in an advert.
Not exactly a job for life.
Endemol advertised in 'The Stage', some media savvy people are to be expected.
If they were using actors, would they actually use their real names? Endemol might make the lion's share of mistakes, but they have heard of the internet.
No, it is you who is either working for Endemol or as gullible as endemol predicted. Simple as. Check out here for the ins and outs of how this is a hoax.
Not even mentioning the bit about the girl from cruel summer 2, who has a different name on this show. They has been a sudden disapearance from google of photos from the show. There is one very quick photo i found on a blueyonder website, and also they left up a pdf of the girl from birminghams cv. Real name Katie Booth.
click for that here
Sadly photos are hard to come by. Katie is Kerry Hasset, who is also from Birmingham coincidently enough. If someone can track down the photos from Cruel Summer 2 on here, maybe we can put this to bed.
I know this girl and her name really is Keri Hassett from Birmingham. She is not an actress but she did appear in cruel summer 2 on Trouble TV. She is just one of those people who want to appear on TV.
