NG
No it was ITV moving their news to 11pm that started all this in the first place, leaving the BBC to fill the vacant 10pm slot.
Well yes, and when the BBC moved to 10pm (whilst the ITC were reviewing the ITV situation), ITV actually welcomed the move. At that time, ITV had bulletins at 6.30pm & 11pm, and were actually happy with that. ITV must have seen it as an opportunity for the ITC to get off their back, as a news requirement was being fulfilled at 10pm, but oh no.
It was the ITC that interferred and created the "News at When" scenario, forcing ITV to move their news back to 10pm when the BBC had already moved their bulletin to that time. The whole conflict and ridiculous compromise thing was a creation of the ITC.
ITV is so much more heavily regulated than the BBC will ever be, why should the ITC have the power to dictate the schedule ? ITV have to go through months of consultation and the approval of the ITC to alter the schedule. But seemingly the BBC can move their bulletin around with a whim.
Doesn't seem right.
That isn't quite accurate.
The BBC announced the move to 2200, but to happen quite a long time after the announcement. ITV welcomed the move at this point - as they believed it would mean the ITC were less likely to demand the ITV news moving to 2200.
The ITC then ruled that ITV DID have to return to 2200 - and ITV had a couple of months to comply.
HOWEVER - in less than a month - and at least 6 months before expected (and 2 or 3 months before ITV) the BBC went ahead and moved their news to 2200 - which surprised everybody - and annoyed ITN/ITV who expected to be returning to 2200 before the BBC...
noggin
Founding member
Square Eyes posted:
Mark Smith posted:
No it was ITV moving their news to 11pm that started all this in the first place, leaving the BBC to fill the vacant 10pm slot.
Well yes, and when the BBC moved to 10pm (whilst the ITC were reviewing the ITV situation), ITV actually welcomed the move. At that time, ITV had bulletins at 6.30pm & 11pm, and were actually happy with that. ITV must have seen it as an opportunity for the ITC to get off their back, as a news requirement was being fulfilled at 10pm, but oh no.
It was the ITC that interferred and created the "News at When" scenario, forcing ITV to move their news back to 10pm when the BBC had already moved their bulletin to that time. The whole conflict and ridiculous compromise thing was a creation of the ITC.
ITV is so much more heavily regulated than the BBC will ever be, why should the ITC have the power to dictate the schedule ? ITV have to go through months of consultation and the approval of the ITC to alter the schedule. But seemingly the BBC can move their bulletin around with a whim.
Doesn't seem right.
That isn't quite accurate.
The BBC announced the move to 2200, but to happen quite a long time after the announcement. ITV welcomed the move at this point - as they believed it would mean the ITC were less likely to demand the ITV news moving to 2200.
The ITC then ruled that ITV DID have to return to 2200 - and ITV had a couple of months to comply.
HOWEVER - in less than a month - and at least 6 months before expected (and 2 or 3 months before ITV) the BBC went ahead and moved their news to 2200 - which surprised everybody - and annoyed ITN/ITV who expected to be returning to 2200 before the BBC...