GO
I guess from a Sky user's point of view it would have looked weird for there to be a Sky3+1 in the EPG but no Sky1 and 2 +1.
Back when it first launched Sky3 was really good and they put some effort into the schedule but it did come dangerously close to beating Sky1's viewing share at its height which would have been a bit embarrassing for them. That's when the programme quality (purposefully) declined to the standard they've got today. I suppose by re-branding it without the Sky name they could try improving the quality again, making some cash out of the free to air/view rights that they have to their various Sky1 programmes without it being quite as embarrassing if and when the viewing share eclipses Sky1.
Though clearly right now they're not making any effort with the schedule!
Back when it first launched Sky3 was really good and they put some effort into the schedule but it did come dangerously close to beating Sky1's viewing share at its height which would have been a bit embarrassing for them. That's when the programme quality (purposefully) declined to the standard they've got today. I suppose by re-branding it without the Sky name they could try improving the quality again, making some cash out of the free to air/view rights that they have to their various Sky1 programmes without it being quite as embarrassing if and when the viewing share eclipses Sky1.
Though clearly right now they're not making any effort with the schedule!