PE
Or a way to make subscribers think Discovery were solely to blame...
peterrocket
Founding member
Sky's FAQ suggest the ball is in Discovery's court from 1 Feb if no deal is reached, in that they can keep broadcasting but won't be getting any money from Sky.
https://www.sky.com/help/articles/changes-to-sky-channels
I don't know if this is just poorly worded, or technically accurate.
Quote:
Sky has chosen not to renew its contract with Discovery, and at any point from 1 February, Discovery can remove them from the Sky platform.
https://www.sky.com/help/articles/changes-to-sky-channels
I don't know if this is just poorly worded, or technically accurate.
Or a way to make subscribers think Discovery were solely to blame...