TV Home Forum

Sky - daftest, most desperate thing I have heard!

(August 2003)

This site closed in March 2021 and is now a read-only archive
:-(
A former member
Having just read the BBC News website about the Edinburgh TV festival, some guy at SKy told an audience about how the BBC should sell of it's best shows to commercial rivals so as to justify the licence fee.

Isn't that just despirate measure to berate the BBC and also get hold of good BBC programes to make their own schedule less than crap!

What do people think?
GS
Gavin Scott Founding member
I quite agree. The notion suggested was that the "BBC should develop shows which could grow in popularity, then sell them to the highest bidder". It is of course nonsense. Sky have the resources but not, it seems, the pool of talent.
WH
Whataday Founding member
And we all know who the highest bidder would be, don't we!
SE
Square Eyes Founding member
Yes that is a ridiculous comment from Sky.

Seems they want to sit back, let somebody else put in all the hard work and then wave the cheque book in the air to acquire the shows. As has been said they've got the resources to make their own programmes yet choose not to or have no talent to do so. They seem happier to fill the schedules with imports, repeats, and all those Uncovered series.
:-(
A former member
it is not ridiculous at all. quite the opposite.

if anything, i think the bbc should be forced to make it's programmes available to other networks. i would much rather all the networks got a share of the bbc's excellent library of programmes than have them spent sitting on the shelf waiting for a late night bbc 2 slot.

Plus the money raised can be ploughed back into original programming and new digital services.

your comments about sky being lazy are invalid. sky has long since been seen as a broadcaster or commissioning broadcaster rather than a production broadcaster. It is not unreasonable for sky to want to open fresh sources of programming for their channels.

And in any case, the bbc being publicly funded corporation, shouldn’t the beeb itself have been making all the technological advancements in digital television? pushing forward interactive? Instead it was left to sky to take the risks.
GS
Gavin Scott Founding member
Terry The Wonder Carcass posted:
it is not ridiculous at all. quite the opposite.

if anything, i think the bbc should be forced to make it's programmes available to other networks. i would much rather all the networks got a share of the bbc's excellent library of programmes than have them spent sitting on the shelf waiting for a late night bbc 2 slot.

Ahh, but the man from Sky was talking about the BBC's current popular output, not the back catalogue. Theres a very big distinction.
MD
mdtauk
Thats how these festival speeches go...

Sky attack BBC
BBC attack ITV
ITV blaims Sky
etc...
BR
britbat
See:
http://tvtoday.co.uk/article.php?p=48&more=1

It's not completely unimaginable that this could become reality one day. That's pretty scary in my opinion.
MO
Moz
mikeprz posted:
Having just read the BBC News website about the Edinburgh TV festival....


Oooooh! Don't vote Tory or you wont be able to do that! Wink
KA
Katherine Founding member
I would like to take this opportunity to say I am a member of the Official Monster Raving Loony Party......
SE
Square Eyes Founding member
Katherine posted:
I would like to take this opportunity to say I am a member of the Official Monster Raving Loony Party......

Yes, I think many of us had already reached that conclusion. But thanks for the confirmation. Very Happy
CO
Corin
Would not a cheaper alternative be, to make Rupert Murdoch director general of the BBC?

It would be a nice going away present from Tony.

Newer posts