TV Home Forum

Richard & Judy Quiz Scam

(February 2007)

This site closed in March 2021 and is now a read-only archive
BB
Brig Bother
I think you're misinterpreting the law, there only has to be an element of skill (or, indeed, a free way in) to eliminate the possibility of it falling under being a lottery, in which case the company has to give a proportion of the profits as tax.

There was actually some debate in the Commons some time ago about outlawing really easy qualifying questions, although goodness knows where that's got to.
JO
Joe
But how would you classify how hard a question was? How long is a piece of string?
JH
Jonathan H
Jugalug posted:
But how would you classify how hard a question was? How long is a piece of string?

You're right. That is a hard question.
ST
Stuart
Jonathan H posted:
Jugalug posted:
But how would you classify how hard a question was? How long is a piece of string?

You're right. That is a hard question.

I'm surprised we haven't seen that one on ITV Play! Shocked
BS
brotherton sands
Jonathan H posted:
Jugalug posted:
But how would you classify how hard a question was? How long is a piece of string?

You're right. That is a hard question.


Who operated camera #3 during the first studio recording block, of the 1970s Dr Who story "Carnival of Monsters"?

Don't know? Exactly!

We all have different realms of knowledge from each other. So, although it's easy for the likes of you and me to say that the questions are "ridiculously easy", there's potentially people out there who won't know the answer. Especially people who aren't into celebrity/pop/media culture, as that is very often the subject matter of phone-in questions.

So, the "ridiculously easy" questions are not unreasonable. As Chris Tarrant would say, "It's only easy if you know the answer".

My mum's fiancee, for example, has absolutely no idea who the band "Queen" are/were. People on this Forum would probably think that " everybody knows who Queen are". But, there is probably no one thing that literally everybody knows about.

Having said all that, I would think that anybody who doesn't know the answers to the kind of things that TV phone-in competitions ask, probably wouldn't be watching the kind of programmes that contain such phone-ins, in the first place...

It's a very bizarre issue. And the phone-ins are easily only just the right side of legal. But there's not such thing as "almost illegal" in law. Either they're on the right side of gambling/competition law, or they're not. If they're *technically* not lotteries, there's nothing more to be argued (sadly).
BB
Brig Bother
Work of Artifice posted:

So, the "ridiculously easy" questions are not unreasonable. As Chris Tarrant would say, "It's only easy if you know the answer".

My mum's fiancee, for example, has absolutely no idea who the band "Queen" are/were. People on this Forum would probably think that " everybody knows who Queen are". But, there is probably no one thing that literally everybody knows about.


Sorry, but that suggests someone who doesn't really know what they're on about. The sort of questions being considered here are easy because they're multiple choice, and the wrong answers are clearly ridiculous and labelled as such, or you've been told the answer less than a minute before the question. The new legislation was meant to put an end to that sort of thing and make sure there was a significant level of inherent skill involved, otherwise they're as good as lotteries anyway.
EM
Elektrik Media
Jugalug posted:
But how would you classify how hard a question was? How long is a piece of string?


Twice the length from one end to the middle Very Happy
:-(
A former member
There now saying there will now give people there Money BACK!
AN
Ant
623058 posted:
There now saying there will now give people there Money BACK!

They also mentioned that Richard and Judy personally didn't know about this until Friday afternoon and are very angry about the whole thing.
TI
This Is Granada
Ant posted:
623058 posted:
There now saying there will now give people there Money BACK!

They also mentioned that Richard and Judy personally didn't know about this until Friday afternoon and are very angry about the whole thing.


Of course their angry cos their name is being dragged through the dirt!

It would not surprise me if the same thing is happening with the phone in comp on the Paul o'grady show!!!
:-(
A former member
NOTE

there said that them self, R&J
BR
Brekkie
Paul O'Grady might be done by a different operator - and also the don't take the caller the same day as you ring in. If you ring in on a Thursday or Friday you're not going to get the chance to play until the next week as the shows are pre-recorded.


Don't know who does the Deal or No Deal comps - I suspect it's iTouch who do alot of things for Endemol.

Newer posts