TV Home Forum

Reminiscing The Big Breakfast

New podcast launched - page 33

This site closed in March 2021 and is now a read-only archive
JC
JCB
I really can't imagine the 2001 revamp ever sticking no matter how much time it was given. By 2001, after 8 years, the publics perception of the show was well and truly cemented. This unapologetically loud, brash, tabloid, everyman show suddenly deciding it wanted to be slick and vaugley hip was just never going to work. It still had one foot in the old BB but there was an embarrassing "upwardly mobile" vibe to it. It was the Hyacinth Bucket era of the big breakfast!

I also thought the house was awful. I really liked the colour schemes but the minimalism, the rounded corners/edges and those stupid boxes on the walls all looked awful imo.
AN
all new Phil
I used to watch The Big Breakfast, probably for the entirety of its run, but the 2001 revamp was terrible. It felt dark and dingy, and too targeted at a very narrow audience whereas it had always had a pretty broad appeal.

Was always a big fan of Mark Little. I don’t know why it stuck with me but I remember him once eating a chilli, and they made it look like steam was coming out of his ears. The few of us in the house watching found it absolutely hysterical. They did silly really well throughout that period - something Tonkinson and co simply couldn’t do. They were too cool, the show was supposed to be naff.
AN
Andrew Founding member
Its just amazing that iconic line ups like Johnny and Denise actually lasted such a short time, just 16 months (with another 4 months later), it feels like it was much longer, it was over before it had started really.

Amazing when you consider 16 months is basically the same as the Adrian and Christine version of Daybreak lasted and that will be barely remembered as a footnote in the history of TV
Ittr, Flux and Brekkie gave kudos
WH
Whataday Founding member
Here's an episode where they'd moved back to the french windows but still using all the relaunch graphics.
I think it works quite well actually.
they didn’t edit out Paul Tonkinson from the titles then

I can’t believe they actually look to have reinstated the original French doors rather than leaving the more modern ones, as if the style of window panes was the issue

Am I right in thinking that the chairs/French windows set up swapped sides of the house at some point between Chris and Gaby and Johnny and Denise?


It's not Paul in the titles.

The problem with exposing the four windows of the doors is that the lack of anything to break the background up would make it look odd when they just put two chairs in front of it. It's often the same when you only have a plate glass window as a background on a TV set. It needs the detail of the curtains and split panes so that the view out of the window doesn't dominate the picture. That will be why the chairs were initially in the corner when they scrapped the sofa.

Consider this shot and how much of it would be window without the split panes and curtains.

*

Basically it would look like they were sat in the garden with a couple of pillars in the way.

I'm sure the switch-around from one side of the living room to the other was seasonal due to the lighting, but I might be wrong?
Last edited by Whataday on 13 October 2020 11:18pm - 2 times in total
Flux and Inspector Sands gave kudos
SO
Soupnzi
Like ‘all new Phil’ I watched for all of its run until 2001. Having seen how hard it was for the show to replace Evans, you always knew when watching Vaughan that they would have an even bigger problem when he eventually departed (just because it very much became his show, with even the later titles reflecting his idiosyncrasies and running jokes).

So watching during 2000 it seemed fairly inevitable that Johnny’s exit would bring the show’s axing soon after. Also the new century only drew attention to the fact that it was very much a 1990s show with a 1990s aesthetic baked into its DNA.
AN
Andrew Founding member
Like ‘all new Phil’ I watched for all of its run until 2001. Having seen how hard it was for the show to replace Evans, you always knew when watching Vaughan that they would have an even bigger problem when he eventually departed (just because it very much became his show, with even the later titles reflecting his idiosyncrasies and running jokes).

I was never a fan of those titles, even though Johnny was obviously hugely successful on the show, I thought it seemed a bit egotistical that even the titles had been taken over by his running jokes, and like you say it made it harder to move on when Johnny left the show.
BR
Brekkie
Was always a big fan of Mark Little. I don’t know why it stuck with me but I remember him once eating a chilli, and they made it look like steam was coming out of his ears. The few of us in the house watching found it absolutely hysterical.

I know we've touched on this before either in this or the previous thread but it was a mistake not giving the show to Mark Little 5 days a week once Chris had left - having a job share never really gave anyone a chance. I think from the previous discussions though it was always a case of waiting for someone better to come along - and we know too that Johnny auditioned with Gaby presumably around 1995. I'm not sure Johnny and Gaby would have worked though - but Chris and Denise would probably have been a joy.

Its just amazing that iconic line ups like Johnny and Denise actually lasted such a short time, just 16 months (with another 4 months later), it feels like it was much longer, it was over before it had started really.

Same with Chris and Gaby really considering he was only there half the week for most of his second year.

Would actually be interesting to see the history of the shows ratings over the ten years and whether they always matched the perception at the time.
WH
Whataday Founding member
I agree the job share was a bad decision but I really didn't like Mark Little and found his over the top enthusiasm very phoney. I'd usually skip the show when he was on.
SW
Steve Williams
Would actually be interesting to see the history of the shows ratings over the ten years and whether they always matched the perception at the time.


Well, even during Johnny Vaughan's era they weren't all that good, in 2000 with Johnny and Liza it was the fifth out of five at breakfast time and that was considered a highly successful era for the show. The people who liked it liked it a lot so it had an influence and a kudos probably beyond its reach. It reminds me of what Chris Evans used to say about his Radio 1 breakfast show, the ratings went up by half a million to seven and a half million when he took over, but he said they didn't just get half a million new listeners, they got seven and a half million new, younger listeners, and changed the demographic profile. So similarly with Johnny and Denise, they may have had pretty much the same number of viewers as the Rick and Sharron nadir, but probably quite a lot of those were younger viewers who hadn't watched it before, offsetting those who had switched off since the Chris and Gaby era as they'd grown out of it, so it was probably quite successful in that regard.

In Morning Glory (the three most-used words on these threads), Peter McHugh from GMTV also said it had an influence beyond its ratings because Denise was so photogenic and made so much news, so they couldn't stick a big photo of Denise in the papers and say it was a failure and nobody was interested, because they clearly were. The other thing as well is that in 1993 it was very much The Big Breakfast or nothing, as Breakfast News was boring as hell and the first few months of GMTV were a shambles, whereas by the end of the decade you had CBBC, Milkshake, a much wider penetration of multichannel TV, a much more established and swaggering GMTV and even Breakfast was a bit lighter.

Like ‘all new Phil’ I watched for all of its run until 2001. Having seen how hard it was for the show to replace Evans, you always knew when watching Vaughan that they would have an even bigger problem when he eventually departed (just because it very much became his show, with even the later titles reflecting his idiosyncrasies and running jokes).

So watching during 2000 it seemed fairly inevitable that Johnny’s exit would bring the show’s axing soon after. Also the new century only drew attention to the fact that it was very much a 1990s show with a 1990s aesthetic baked into its DNA.


That's true enough, the idea in 2001 was seemingly that they'd been able to afrrest the decline and replicate the Chris and Gaby magic once, so they could presumably do it again, but that ignored the two or three years of flailing around they had before they finally stumbled on Johnny and Denise, and they certainly didn't have the time to go through all that again. It was like Live and Kicking at the same time, like that the show had managed to be successfully reinvented after the departure of the original hosts, but Zoe and Jamie were such a popular team their replacements were always going to be compared to them and found wanting, hence the umpteen revamps of that before they finally gave up.

As I say, I watched The Big Breakfast from day one and was obsessed with it until Evans left, then carried on watching with diminished enthusiasm right up to the Rick and Sharron golden age. In fact I stopped watching it pretty much just as it was getting good again, partly because I'd gone to university and was never up in time, but I came back to it in mid-98 when Johnny and Denise were in their pomp and watched it most days (although as a student and then dossing around after graduation, I barely saw much before 8.30, not like under Chris and Gaby when I set my alarm for 6.55), before abandoning it completely after Vaughan left.

I always thought Danny Baker & Rosemarie Ford were the first non-Chris & Gaby combo, though I bow to Steve’s immense knowledge.


As I say, I was obsessed with the show at the time so I would faithfully note down anything to do with it in my diary, so I remember Carol Smillie hosted in March and Rosemarie Ford did it in May, because I remember watching her do it when we were on half-term.

Yep and a game that was played by couples in bed - 'Tickle Your Trout' I'll leave the rules of that to your imagination. There was a game for kids too: 'The Kids are Right but Only if They're Wrong' which was an interesting contrast.

Such a great show and was never quite the same when he tried to take it elsewhere. His Radio 1 Sunday shows were very flat without an audience and he often just used stuff he'd done that morning.

His producer was Andy Davies, later best known for Jonathan Ross' Saturday Morning Radio 2 shows. I think they were kind of the successor to Round at Chris's... Chris left GLR and took the show to Virgin, then Ross took over the slot there, later moving to Radio 2 and taking Andy with him


The Kids Are Alright was another feature he took to Radio 1 in the early days, along with a variation on Tickle Your Trout in the shape of I'm In Bed With My Boyfriend. All those features then went for a burton within the first year and by mid-96 it was just Evans talking non-stop and settling scores, as I say it probably went off the boil quicker than The Big Breakfast, the nadir being the week in Scotland in the summer of 1996 which was a horrible, self-indulgent mess on the air, a party the listener wasn't invited to.

As mentioned in The Nation's Favourite, his first stint on Radio 1 on Sunday afternoons in 1992, before The Big Breakfast, wasn't very successful. Johnny Beerling says it was too similar to his GLR show and didn't think anyone who didn't listen to that would get it, and Evans himself says that he was told he wasn't allowed to have an audience because it would sound too much like Steve Wright's show.

As you say, Evans took the show direct to Virgin when that started in April 1993, but only for three months before giving it up because he was too busy to do it. In fact the first replacement was Paul Ross, Jonathan didn't start in that slot until 1998 when Evans was actually in charge of the station and he personally signed him up, his career was completely down the toilet at the time. There's some interesting stuff in Evans' book about his time running Virgin, including how he came up with the idea of Rock'n'Roll Football on a Saturday morning and promptly did it on air that afternoon, and it's still running now over twenty years later.
DE88, Brekkie and Flux gave kudos
FL
Flux
Here's an episode where they'd moved back to the french windows but still using all the relaunch graphics.
I think it works quite well actually.
they didn’t edit out Paul Tonkinson from the titles then

I can’t believe they actually look to have reinstated the original French doors rather than leaving the more modern ones, as if the style of window panes was the issue

Am I right in thinking that the chairs/French windows set up swapped sides of the house at some point between Chris and Gaby and Johnny and Denise?


It's not Paul in the titles.

The problem with exposing the four windows of the doors is that the lack of anything to break the background up would make it look odd when they just put two chairs in front of it. It's often the same when you only have a plate glass window as a background on a TV set. It needs the detail of the curtains and split panes so that the view out of the window doesn't dominate the picture. That will be why the chairs were initially in the corner when they scrapped the sofa.

Consider this shot and how much of it would be window without the split panes and curtains.

*

Basically it would look like they were sat in the garden with a couple of pillars in the way.

I'm sure the switch-around from one side of the living room to the other was seasonal due to the lighting, but I might be wrong?


Thing is they didn’t need to be at the windows at all in 2001. They could have easily stayed to the side in front of the hall and adapted their look from there. Where in the house they were presenting from was never the issue.

As I understood it, Chris and Gaby were always at one side of the house, then the 96 relaunch works on the house cluttered up the background from those French windows, so when they started to put everything back they put the chairs in front of the (new) windows at the other side as it gave them a cleaner background straight into the garden and they never went back to the original side again. But I might be off the mark with that.
JB
JasonB
The chairs moved again at some point during Autumn 2001 as shown here:
BR
Brekkie
More to the point Amanda and Richard are wrong way round.

They quite often moved away from the French Windows for the Christmas shows so it wasn't 3pm in the afternoon behind them. Throughout the shows history it was often just moving to the side but I think during the early years they also repositioned in front of the fireplace.

Newer posts