Although I'm puzzled as to why many in the media refer to the BNP as "far" right. Left vs right wing boils down to how much control the state has over economics: Thus far-left is communism, far-right is a totally unregulated market.
Left-Right politics is a broader term than just economics - it applies to the overall outlook of the party. You seem to be confusing Capitalistic and Communistic economics with the political spectrum. Fascists, which the BNP are
sometimes
described as, generally follow the "Third Position" regarding economics.
I probably didn't make my point very well in last post: My point was, there is more to the political spectrum than just right vs left; there's also the libertarian vs authoritarian continuum to consider, something that is often forgotten by many journalists. For instance Friedman was very right-wing, but not a fascist. Ghandi was very left-wing, but not a communist. In other words, just considering left vs right is not proper political analysis.
There is a little more to left vs right wing than just economics, I concede. However I would say capitalist vs communist economics
basically
does define the left-wing/right-wing continuum, certainly if one considers the Nolan Chart: For more social matters/attitudes, it factors in that other continuum-- authoritarian vs libertarian. Thus you have four quadrants: Left-authoritarian, right-authoritarian, left-libertarian and right- libertarian.
This explains it better than I could:
http://www.politicalcompass.org/analysis2
Anyway I think getting Griffin and his ilk on to QT would be 'good', in that people can see just what a miserable bunch they are. I do wonder how many people who voted for them in EP elections, realise just how extreme they are.
Last edited by Roger Mellie on 7 September 2009 5:52pm