We are PC, BBC finally admits

Really?

It does explain a lot, I must say. Which came first, the opinions or the newspaper?

The opinions, Mark, as already stated.

There's a lot in the Daily Mail which I don't agree with, its political allegience and views on hunting to name but a few.

Take out the Mail's political views and what do you have left exactly?

It's a pointless little rag read by mostly pointless little people. Whenever you see a Mail reader on a train it's always some sour-faced old prune who invariably turns out to be a nasty piece of work when you talk to them.

What anyone under the age of 50 is doing reading it is beyond me.

I am a 36 year old Mail reader, and proud of it. I have a friend who is a 34 year old mail reader, and very proud of it. My brother is a 26 year old mail reader and proud of it.

Not only that, we are all really nice people. I take the train daily, most of the time I am endorsing in the Daily Mail. Perhaps you should take the train in my area more often.

Now the thing about the 'little people' what exactly is that supposed to mean? Are giants generally observer readers or something? Perhaps you mean that it is insignificant people who read the mail? I am sure Margaret Thatcher reads the mail, the best and most significant PM we have ever had.

Now crawl back under that yellow, crap infested rock, called the Lib Dems which you appear to come from, and never speak about the Daily Mail and its readers like that again.

I like the small amusing stories in the Reader's Digest. I can read a handful of them while I poo.

And I used to quite like Look In magazine.

I certainly wouldn't want to be identified by a publication I read.

What is this thread turning into?

I'm finding this all rather amusing. Not only are you "proud" to read a newspaper (whatever that means), you appear to be going out of your way to tell everyone else about it, to the point of telling strangers on a train how great it is.

The automatic assumption that anyone who dislikes the Mail is a Lib-Dem-loving leftie, while getting all puffed up, completely unprompted, about the magnificent Maggie is all classic Mail-reader behaviour though.

You really are easy to prod aren't you?

I think this discussion has lit a certain fuse!!!!

You sound surprised.... it was either that or The Telegraph surely?

Comedy gold.

I think that before it all turns nasty and people get warnings following complaints from he-whose-name-is-included-in-the-spam-filter there should be a period of calm.

The views expressed early in this thread speak for themselves and need no added ridicule.