TV Home Forum

The Paul O'Grady Show - axed

Channel 4 show comes to an end. (August 2009)

This site closed in March 2021 and is now a read-only archive
PT
Put The Telly On
Quote:
Channel 4 is to axe Paul O'Grady's chat show after he refused to take a drastic cut in his £2million-a-year salary.

The star's contract expires at the end of the year and he is now expected to join Sky in a lucrative deal.

Channel 4 planned to slash the budget on O'Grady's hit teatime show as it grapples with the recession.

It would have seen the presenter's salary cut by an estimated 30 per cent. However, he was not prepared to take the pay drop and in the face of a multi-million pound offer from a rival channel, the two parties have agreed to part ways.

The decision will come as a massive blow to the star's fans who have got used to seeing him every night on terrestrial TV.

It will also mark the end of one of the most successful daytime shows in recent years. The Paul O'Grady Show has won a string of awards and has in the past attracted 3million viewers.

O'Grady defected to Channel 4 in January 2006 after an ugly falling out with ITV bosses following two successful years doing a similar show.

Earlier this year he said he was prepared to take a pay cut, but admitted he did not know how long he would continue with the show.

He would have lost further money if he had renewed his contract because his own production company, Olga TV, makes the programme.

O'Grady, 54, is just the latest star to have been cut loose by Channel 4. Carol Vorderman left Countdown after she said she was told to accept a 90 per cent pay cut.

The channel's other tea-time stars Richard and Judy also left when their show was dropped last year.

It is understood O'Grady has been offered a prime-time talk show at Sky One in a deal which insiders claim could top £9million over a number of years. Sky One wants him to help the channel broaden its appeal to women.

This is not the first time the broadcaster has tried to steal O'Grady from Channel 4 having offered him a reported £16million deal in 2007.

The last Channel 4 Paul O'Grady Show is expected to air in December.

An insider said: 'Paul has worked for a lot of different broadcasters and he does like a change. He is being offered a lot of money from Sky.'

Sky did not deny it was trying to poach the star but simply said 'at this stage' it had no further talent signings to announce.

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-1210086/C4-axes-2m-OGrady-Chat-star-refuses-30-pay-cut-broadcaster-battles-recession.html#ixzz0PiVUVqMq


Don't know how much of this is "official" but I think personally the show was on it's last legs anyway. But alas, it's yet another jewel in Channel 4's crown gone.
Last edited by Put The Telly On on 18 December 2009 2:54pm - 5 times in total
BR
Brekkie
There were reports earlier this year Paul was in talks to take it back to ITV - not because of cuts to his own salary, but because the overall budget cuts were too much to take. There were also reports though the deal with C4 was done and dusted. And of course there have long been reports Paul wouldn't sign another deal anyway.

C4 being a bit short sighted IMO in letting it go - yes, cuts need to be made and other shows in the 5pm hour are cheaper, but losing all live content from daytime is a shame, and I'm sure significant savings could have been made by just cutting each series to around 8 weeks instead of 12-13 weeks.

As for the future - I don't think moving the show anywhere else is worth it really, Paul would be better off taking new prime-time opportunities.
ST
stevek2
I think these defecting tv stars refusing pay cuts just shows personal greed, they're on say £300,000 a year and wont take a 10% pay cut, there's thousands of people out there who can't get jobs who wouldn't say no to £30,000 a year. They're not exactly getting sacked or made redundant like a lot of people are and have been
ME
mediaman2007
Strange this report should come on a Bank Holiday Monday when nobody from C4 or Olga will be around to confirm or deny. Hmm..not sure I believe.
BR
Brekkie
Remember though this story is from the Daily Mail.

Reports earlier in the year suggests Paul was more than willing to take the personal pay cut, but concerned about the budget cuts to the show itself - which would inevitably lead to redundancies amongst his staff.

I guess though Paul's autumn series will go ahead, so it'll be interesting to see what he has to say about C4!
TV
TV Geek
If he goes to Sky he NEEDS to do a post watershed chat show that isn't family orientated, otherwise it will be just as successful as Richard and Judy on Watch.
ME
mediaman2007
Remember though this story is from the Daily Mail.

Reports earlier in the year suggests Paul was more than willing to take the personal pay cut, but concerned about the budget cuts to the show itself - which would inevitably lead to redundancies amongst his staff.

I guess though Paul's autumn series will go ahead, so it'll be interesting to see what he has to say about C4!


Exactly, with quotes from Paul himself. This feels like a bit of a slow news day for The Mail
IS
Inspector Sands
I think these defecting tv stars refusing pay cuts just shows personal greed, they're on say £300,000 a year and wont take a 10% pay cut, there's thousands of people out there who can't get jobs who wouldn't say no to £30,000 a year. They're not exactly getting sacked or made redundant like a lot of people are and have been


It doesn't quite work like that though does it?

People live to their means. A 30% pay-cut is a 30% paycut whether you earn £30k or £300k

In this case there's another issue - as the article mentions the programme is made by Paul o Grady's own company so less money means they don't have as much to spend on the production. It's most likely a quality issue to Paul as well
IS
Inspector Sands
If he goes to Sky he NEEDS to do a post watershed chat show that isn't family orientated, otherwise it will be just as successful as Richard and Judy on Watch.


It'll only last a series at the most on Sky1 anyway... they are always doing remakesm, or poaching stars or programmes, or from other channels and despite the initial blaze of publicity they disappear without trace.

Richad & Judy's problem wasn't their time-slot - they were on at roughly the same time as they were on C4, it was most of their former viewers either didn't know they were still on air/couldn't find Watch/ or didn't have pay-tv
TV
TV Geek
If he goes to Sky he NEEDS to do a post watershed chat show that isn't family orientated, otherwise it will be just as successful as Richard and Judy on Watch.


It'll only last a series at the most on Sky1 anyway... they are always doing remakesm, or poaching stars or programmes, or from other channels and despite the initial blaze of publicity they disappear without trace.

Richad & Judy's problem wasn't their time-slot - they were on at roughly the same time as they were on C4, it was most of their former viewers either didn't know they were still on air/couldn't find Watch/ or didn't have pay-tv


I think time slot had a large part to play. The terrestrial channels struggle to get 2m viewers at 5pm so digital channels don't have a hope in hell of doing that well, and the original 8pm slot was very competitive. And when they moved to 6pm, I'd imagine most of their original audience were watching the news. The show was dead on arrival and there is nowhere really for a daytime chat show on digital TV. I expect Angela Griffin will learn this the hard way.

I agree about Sky1, they move on very quickly e.g. all the Gladiators publicity only for it to be axed after 2 series'.
ME
mediaman2007
If he goes to Sky he NEEDS to do a post watershed chat show that isn't family orientated, otherwise it will be just as successful as Richard and Judy on Watch.


It'll only last a series at the most on Sky1 anyway... they are always doing remakesm, or poaching stars or programmes, or from other channels and despite the initial blaze of publicity they disappear without trace.

Richad & Judy's problem wasn't their time-slot - they were on at roughly the same time as they were on C4, it was most of their former viewers either didn't know they were still on air/couldn't find Watch/ or didn't have pay-tv


Yep. If this was true (I'm highly doubting at this moment but since the contract with C4 is nearly up it is a valid discussion) I really don't think Sky1 would be the place to go. Maybe 1 day it will be able to get the same viewers as the terrestrials but now I don't think it matters what show goes there, it won't get as much as it enjoyed on the likes of C4.

If it does turn out he is leaving C4, I could see the show going back to ITV. They're still trying to recreate the success they had when he was in their 5pm slot and I don't think it would be a mistake on their part to at least consider it. They could probably get a cheaper deal than before but still more than C4 are offering. I also think the show as much better when it was on ITV, because ITV's audience are more suited to the format for one thing.
TV
TV Geek
If it does turn out he is leaving C4, I could see the show going back to ITV. They're still trying to recreate the success they had when he was in their 5pm slot and I don't think it would be a mistake on their part to at least consider it. They could probably get a cheaper deal than before but still more than C4 are offering. I also think the show as much better when it was on ITV, because ITV's audience are more suited to the format for one thing.


They're not. ITV haven't done a 5pm chat show since Antony Cotton's about 2 years ago. ITV have been building up a strong line up of gameshows and cooking shows which have been rating very well for them.

Newer posts