:-(
ROFL, yes i can see it now - greg on the phone to lorraine "listen guys, we're going to have to move the news back to 9.00 - itv have proved there is a demand for it, but aren’t quite sure if it is commercially viable - it doesn’t matter if we fall flat on our arses".
HAHA!!
"Commercially viable" is a very good excuse...but not a viable argument.
Newsnight is commercially viable, but a "boring old bulletin" would die on BBC2.
My point: ITV News at Nine could be very viable if it was more newsnight and less boring old bulletin.
And why not?
Before the war the "News at When?" was dragged around the schedule like it didnt matter...so why ITV would want to go back to the way things were is beyond me.
A former member
tvmercia posted:
Brekkie Boy posted:
ITV are dropping the News at Nine tonight. They just said that Lucky Jim will be on at 9.05pm, after the ITV News Headlines.
I think ITV's experiment shows that the BBC should reinstate the 9pm News. ITV are under no obligation to move from their "10pm" slot, and with the success of most ITV dramas at 9pm, I see no reason to move them.
I think ITV's experiment shows that the BBC should reinstate the 9pm News. ITV are under no obligation to move from their "10pm" slot, and with the success of most ITV dramas at 9pm, I see no reason to move them.
ROFL, yes i can see it now - greg on the phone to lorraine "listen guys, we're going to have to move the news back to 9.00 - itv have proved there is a demand for it, but aren’t quite sure if it is commercially viable - it doesn’t matter if we fall flat on our arses".
HAHA!!
"Commercially viable" is a very good excuse...but not a viable argument.
Newsnight is commercially viable, but a "boring old bulletin" would die on BBC2.
My point: ITV News at Nine could be very viable if it was more newsnight and less boring old bulletin.
And why not?
Before the war the "News at When?" was dragged around the schedule like it didnt matter...so why ITV would want to go back to the way things were is beyond me.