:-(
A former member
spammer??? huh??
im in a rush- im doing my posting all in one- i cant come back later.
if you check your faxts youll see im a very frequent poster so keep your nose out.
for your info
i own t-shirt zoo
im in a rush- im doing my posting all in one- i cant come back later.
if you check your faxts youll see im a very frequent poster so keep your nose out.
for your info
i own t-shirt zoo
:-(
A former member
One post every one and a half days isn't frequent. And you just started several threads! You could've replied to existing ones instead! It was announced two days ago about The Office, so we already know about that.
:-(
A former member
i didnt read the other post- sorry!!!
like i said im in a rush
ive not been on the net for a week or so, so i had a lot of comments
im not like others who are geeks living in front of a pc
like i said im in a rush
ive not been on the net for a week or so, so i had a lot of comments
im not like others who are geeks living in front of a pc
:-(
A former member
That so? So are you saying that everyone who does mocks for APFS, or runs one of the many ident sites around, are geeks? Because, it sure sounds like it.
:-(
But without 'geeks' you wouldn't be using your computer, because it wouldn't exist. As a matter of fact, virtually every material item you own and use was invented by 'geeks', which in a way makes you one for using them.
A former member
CC100 posted:
im not like others who are geeks living in front of a pc
But without 'geeks' you wouldn't be using your computer, because it wouldn't exist. As a matter of fact, virtually every material item you own and use was invented by 'geeks', which in a way makes you one for using them.
PE
Pete
Founding member
Well I think as it's the Christmas special it's ok. Why should it make a difference anyways.
Spiring you sad luddite freak - why won't you just sod off. If you took any notice of the stuff in the ticker thtread you'd have noticed that Phil and Kat are not the only "thorns in your side" but I, re-it and c@t also want you to sod off.
Now kindly shoo. mwah mwah cheerio.
Spiring you sad luddite freak - why won't you just sod off. If you took any notice of the stuff in the ticker thtread you'd have noticed that Phil and Kat are not the only "thorns in your side" but I, re-it and c@t also want you to sod off.
Now kindly shoo. mwah mwah cheerio.
:-(
Bizarrely yes, the same with Channels 4 & 5 and ITV.
It's often a traditional thing, certain generations still have the attitude that 2 and 4 contain stuff they won't like so they don't watch them
A former member
moss posted:
I always find it odd how something automatically gets far higher viewing figures when it moves from BBC TWO to BBC ONE; see Changing Rooms for a good example. Are there people out there who just refuse to watch BBC TWO?
Bizarrely yes, the same with Channels 4 & 5 and ITV.
It's often a traditional thing, certain generations still have the attitude that 2 and 4 contain stuff they won't like so they don't watch them
:-(
A former member
I don't see the big deal here.
I (like most people here, I would assume) get both BBC1 and BBC2, so I'd can watch the shows I want to see regardless of which channel they are on.
Occassionally, it's better for something to be on BBC2, as it won't get pre-empted for a local news/documentary/sport show (BBC1 NI has been doing a lot of local sports on weekends recently), but other than that, who cares?
I (like most people here, I would assume) get both BBC1 and BBC2, so I'd can watch the shows I want to see regardless of which channel they are on.
Occassionally, it's better for something to be on BBC2, as it won't get pre-empted for a local news/documentary/sport show (BBC1 NI has been doing a lot of local sports on weekends recently), but other than that, who cares?