BR
http://media.guardian.co.uk/broadcast/story/0,,2111863,00.html
The Sky DTT thing has cropped up again, with OFCOM now saying they will open public consultation on the plans and report next year - and Sky saying how dare OFCOM want to consult on something!
Why OFCOM just don't throw it out I don't know - but when the consultation does come around I think it's worth trying to get your point in as so often you only here about these "consultations" after they've closed and OFCOM announce they've only had something like 30 comments!
My objection is simple. Firstly, it's the Sky monopoly, but secondly, it's the reality of the idea - it's not going to be priced at a rate which would stop people subscribing to the full Sky Digital service, so anyone who really wants it might as well shell out for Sky instead.
IMO the solution is simple - Sky make a "Sky by Wire" service (as seen on Homechoice) available for (the increasing) Freeview/IPTV market - and therefore there is no need to remove their three Sky channels on Freeview.
The Sky DTT thing has cropped up again, with OFCOM now saying they will open public consultation on the plans and report next year - and Sky saying how dare OFCOM want to consult on something!
Why OFCOM just don't throw it out I don't know - but when the consultation does come around I think it's worth trying to get your point in as so often you only here about these "consultations" after they've closed and OFCOM announce they've only had something like 30 comments!
My objection is simple. Firstly, it's the Sky monopoly, but secondly, it's the reality of the idea - it's not going to be priced at a rate which would stop people subscribing to the full Sky Digital service, so anyone who really wants it might as well shell out for Sky instead.
IMO the solution is simple - Sky make a "Sky by Wire" service (as seen on Homechoice) available for (the increasing) Freeview/IPTV market - and therefore there is no need to remove their three Sky channels on Freeview.