ST
Nope. It has been stipulated by the regulatory authorities that 101-105 must be available to the various terrestrial channels.
Oh right, didn't realise that - but effectively - for the rest of the EPG, Sky can put any channel where it likes. It doesn't need to get the consent from the channel involved in order to move it.
I believe I read on a thread some time ago on here that any channel signing a contract to appear on Sky's EPG had a right to that position (and originally the 2 subsequent numbers) in relation to other channels within their section of the EPG . In other words all Documentaries could move from 551 to 901, but they would have to keep the main Discovery channels at the top,
I'm not sure what deal BBC made with Sky in 2003 to move BBC THREE/FOUR from 160/161 to 115/116 (originally Disney) but it was probably to do with the payment to include all the other regions in the 800s and the necessary postcode allocation for channels 101/102.
Perhaps someone has better knowledge of the precise information regarding EPG positioning?
I certainly can't see Sky moving (for example) LivingTV to the bottom of the 100s as this would seriously affect their chances when renegotiating a decent contract renewal payment.
EDIT: It's worth remembering just how ITV3 managed to go on DSat on their launch night (after being told by Sky that there was no available EPG position)! ITV plc bought out Sky's share of GSkyB that afternoon, and then closed Granada Plus at 4:30pm the same day (without much notice) and then moved ITV2 to EPG 118, allowing them to use 119 for ITV3. They wouldn't have been able to do that without some contractual owenership of the EPG position.
jay posted:
mromega posted:
jay posted:
Secondly, Sky can do what they like with any broadcasters' channel numbers - it just makes sense for 101-105 to be for the main terrestrial channels. They certainly don't need consent.
Nope. It has been stipulated by the regulatory authorities that 101-105 must be available to the various terrestrial channels.
Oh right, didn't realise that - but effectively - for the rest of the EPG, Sky can put any channel where it likes. It doesn't need to get the consent from the channel involved in order to move it.
I believe I read on a thread some time ago on here that any channel signing a contract to appear on Sky's EPG had a right to that position (and originally the 2 subsequent numbers) in relation to other channels within their section of the EPG . In other words all Documentaries could move from 551 to 901, but they would have to keep the main Discovery channels at the top,
I'm not sure what deal BBC made with Sky in 2003 to move BBC THREE/FOUR from 160/161 to 115/116 (originally Disney) but it was probably to do with the payment to include all the other regions in the 800s and the necessary postcode allocation for channels 101/102.
Perhaps someone has better knowledge of the precise information regarding EPG positioning?
I certainly can't see Sky moving (for example) LivingTV to the bottom of the 100s as this would seriously affect their chances when renegotiating a decent contract renewal payment.
EDIT: It's worth remembering just how ITV3 managed to go on DSat on their launch night (after being told by Sky that there was no available EPG position)! ITV plc bought out Sky's share of GSkyB that afternoon, and then closed Granada Plus at 4:30pm the same day (without much notice) and then moved ITV2 to EPG 118, allowing them to use 119 for ITV3. They wouldn't have been able to do that without some contractual owenership of the EPG position.