BR
So is it Scotland, or just Alex Sammond, that wants a new Scottish channel then?
The Scottish Broadcasting Commission recommends:
· A new digital channel, publicly funded from any new public service broadcasting obligation, including a strong online element with special content
· Ofcom should require STV to maintain its news and current affairs, and non-new Scottish content, in a new public service settlement
· The BBC Trust should ensure all the corporation's news and current affairs better reflects the UK's nations and regions
· All the main TV networks should improve their coverage and commissioning in a way "relevant" to them
· Channel 4 should be forced to increase its spending in Scotland to 8.6% as a condition of its public funding and also base one of its commissioning departments in Scotland
http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2008/sep/08/television.scotland
http://blogs.guardian.co.uk/tv/2008/09/scotland_doesnt_need_a_scottis.html
However, the idea of a Scottish Six is rejected.
It seems based on politics rather than the demands of the Scottish audience IMO. And a bit of contradiction in their report - on the one hand saying STV should be forced to keep their news commitment, but on the other saying they need a new channel because STV may drop local content. Which itself is highly unlikely IMO - STV sells itself on it's Scottish credentials - they're hardly likely to drop them.
The Scottish Broadcasting Commission recommends:
· A new digital channel, publicly funded from any new public service broadcasting obligation, including a strong online element with special content
· Ofcom should require STV to maintain its news and current affairs, and non-new Scottish content, in a new public service settlement
· The BBC Trust should ensure all the corporation's news and current affairs better reflects the UK's nations and regions
· All the main TV networks should improve their coverage and commissioning in a way "relevant" to them
· Channel 4 should be forced to increase its spending in Scotland to 8.6% as a condition of its public funding and also base one of its commissioning departments in Scotland
http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2008/sep/08/television.scotland
http://blogs.guardian.co.uk/tv/2008/09/scotland_doesnt_need_a_scottis.html
However, the idea of a Scottish Six is rejected.
It seems based on politics rather than the demands of the Scottish audience IMO. And a bit of contradiction in their report - on the one hand saying STV should be forced to keep their news commitment, but on the other saying they need a new channel because STV may drop local content. Which itself is highly unlikely IMO - STV sells itself on it's Scottish credentials - they're hardly likely to drop them.