MI
Rubbish. Most of my posts are not "banal", and I've said that I'm an orthapeadic surgeon and have been for 12 years. What kind of "proof" do you want? I'm certainly not giving out my name.
Btw, I was winding him up re the BBC - the comment was not to be taken literally.
Decided which reply you want to post yet?
As for proof, just tell us anything you think can make you believable. Details about your working pattern, the nature of your work, or even where you trained.
Mich
Founding member
Joe Havard posted:
Mich posted:
Whereas Joe, your posts are largely banal, and when asked to provide evidence of what you are saying is true, can't seem to do so.
Rubbish. Most of my posts are not "banal", and I've said that I'm an orthapeadic surgeon and have been for 12 years. What kind of "proof" do you want? I'm certainly not giving out my name.
Btw, I was winding him up re the BBC - the comment was not to be taken literally.
Decided which reply you want to post yet?
As for proof, just tell us anything you think can make you believable. Details about your working pattern, the nature of your work, or even where you trained.
GS
I think you'll find that's, "orthopaedic surgeon".
How peculiar that you don't know how to spell it.
Gavin Scott
Founding member
Joe Havard posted:
Rubbish. Most of my posts are not "banal", and I've said that I'm an
orthapeadic surgeon
and have been for 12 years. What kind of "proof" do you want? I'm certainly not giving out my name.
I think you'll find that's, "orthopaedic surgeon".
How peculiar that you don't know how to spell it.
:-(
I think you'll find that's, "orthopaedic surgeon".
How peculiar that you wouldn't know how to spell it.
I'm dyslexic, so it's not perculiar at at all.
A former member
Gavin Scott posted:
Joe Havard posted:
Rubbish. Most of my posts are not "banal", and I've said that I'm an
orthapeadic surgeon
and have been for 12 years. What kind of "proof" do you want? I'm certainly not giving out my name.
I think you'll find that's, "orthopaedic surgeon".
How peculiar that you wouldn't know how to spell it.
I'm dyslexic, so it's not perculiar at at all.
GS
Well then I suppose everything is wrapped up in a neat little package.
I'm needed in the other room to have a snigger.
Gavin Scott
Founding member
Joe Havard posted:
I'm dyslexic, so it's not perculiar at at all.
Well then I suppose everything is wrapped up in a neat little package.
I'm needed in the other room to have a snigger.
CY
I notice a lot of praise for channel four's idents, but I think people are forgetting that the '4' logo is quite versatile.
Yes the '4' logo is very distinctive but for nearly 10 years the ident was reduced to being inside a box or a square and actually had some very uninspired idents. It's only now that people say how good the idents are for Channel 4.
And this is why I thought that they should have used the '1' on BBC1 that was introduced in 1991. It was distinctive, striking and when somebody with imagination was in charge of the campaign, they produced some great work like their Christmas idents in 1993 and 1994.
On a slightly unrelated note what are the chances of some of the current Channel 4 idents being made available on TV Ark?
imaginativename posted:
I notice a lot of praise for channel four's idents, but I think people are forgetting that the '4' logo is quite versatile.
Yes the '4' logo is very distinctive but for nearly 10 years the ident was reduced to being inside a box or a square and actually had some very uninspired idents. It's only now that people say how good the idents are for Channel 4.
And this is why I thought that they should have used the '1' on BBC1 that was introduced in 1991. It was distinctive, striking and when somebody with imagination was in charge of the campaign, they produced some great work like their Christmas idents in 1993 and 1994.
On a slightly unrelated note what are the chances of some of the current Channel 4 idents being made available on TV Ark?
:-(
I pressed quote instead of edit twice.
I trained at the University of Manchester from 1980-1989. I stuggled to decide which career path to take and decided, eventually to go into peadiatric neurology. Child phsycology was, at the time, probably the most enjoyable and interesting area I had ever studied. I moved to Sheffield in 1990 as there was a vacancy at the Ryegate Childrens's Centre. I left in late 1993, mainly because I found it a deeply depressing job in the end. I moved north to Bradford the same year and decided to become a surgeon. Orthapeadics was another area which I enjoyed, and finally started work as an orthapeadic surgeon in January 1995 at Leeds General Infirmary, until I started work elsewhere and was made a consultant after 3 years. I still work there today, but I cannot state the location for obvious reasons.
A former member
Mich posted:
Decided which reply you want to post yet?
As for proof, just tell us anything you think can make you believable. Details about your working pattern, the nature of your work, or even where you trained.
As for proof, just tell us anything you think can make you believable. Details about your working pattern, the nature of your work, or even where you trained.
I pressed quote instead of edit twice.
I trained at the University of Manchester from 1980-1989. I stuggled to decide which career path to take and decided, eventually to go into peadiatric neurology. Child phsycology was, at the time, probably the most enjoyable and interesting area I had ever studied. I moved to Sheffield in 1990 as there was a vacancy at the Ryegate Childrens's Centre. I left in late 1993, mainly because I found it a deeply depressing job in the end. I moved north to Bradford the same year and decided to become a surgeon. Orthapeadics was another area which I enjoyed, and finally started work as an orthapeadic surgeon in January 1995 at Leeds General Infirmary, until I started work elsewhere and was made a consultant after 3 years. I still work there today, but I cannot state the location for obvious reasons.
IM
cylon, surely BBC one should distinguish itself from 4 though? They do something with the numeral and that works for them, but it wouldn't look very good if BBC ONE copied that idea. The circles are rooted deeper in BBC one's history than '1' symbols and even the globe - see my posts a couple of pages back.
How come this site has turned into bitchforum?
Also, like the endboards if those are actual examples rather than just a demo of the font. Is the red circle the official BBC one logo then perhaps? Maybe they'll use that when the other channel logos are shown on the same screen/ page?
How come this site has turned into bitchforum?
Also, like the endboards if those are actual examples rather than just a demo of the font. Is the red circle the official BBC one logo then perhaps? Maybe they'll use that when the other channel logos are shown on the same screen/ page?
TV
http://img142.imageshack.us/img142/3584/regboldag5.jpg
Why do I get the feeling this so-called "custom font" is so close to one that's already in the public domain. A strange hybrid of Corinthian and Johnston Underground spring to mind. Remember, the BBC can only do this because of the unique way they are funded. By us.
The organisation is called the BRITISH Broadcasting Corporation, and the dancers were so obsessed with inclusivity they seemed to lose sight of this.
Why do I get the feeling this so-called "custom font" is so close to one that's already in the public domain. A strange hybrid of Corinthian and Johnston Underground spring to mind. Remember, the BBC can only do this because of the unique way they are funded. By us.
marksi posted:
Carry on with the ideas, we're listening...
The organisation is called the BRITISH Broadcasting Corporation, and the dancers were so obsessed with inclusivity they seemed to lose sight of this.