The obsession with Gogglebox is getting ridiculous. We've got takeaway adverts based around friends sitting on couches and talking about their favourite food, and I STILL can't get over why the BBC thought it was a good idea for Watchdog's anniversary special to be interspersed with families watching the show on TV and saying "ooh I remember that". That has to be the worst.
That new big font on the end board looks so bad, especially as they’ve just increased the size within the current design.
I know lots of BBC One programmes have high numbers of older viewers, so maybe it’s intended for the partially sighted.
I wonder if the BBC1 presentation, continuity and general vibe is the reason it is down over 2% on last year's viewing figures and ITV is up by the same amount? The general look and feel of the channel is like Wilko's compared to ITV's WHSmith. Some digital channels fail because they just look bad. BBC1 is going that way in my opinion.
Anyone else often wonder what planet certain posters are living on? Very few people care about TV presentation outside this forum. People still tune in to watch Blue Planet, Strictly, & Happy Valley despite "Oneness" and messy trailer endboards.
That new big font on the end board looks so bad, especially as they’ve just increased the size within the current design.
I know lots of BBC One programmes have high numbers of older viewers, so maybe it’s intended for the partially sighted.
I wonder if the BBC1 presentation, continuity and general vibe is the reason it is down over 2% on last year's viewing figures and ITV is up by the same amount? The general look and feel of the channel is like Wilko's compared to ITV's WHSmith. Some digital channels fail because they just look bad. BBC1 is going that way in my opinion.
Anyone else often wonder what planet certain posters are living on? Very few people care about TV presentation outside this forum. People still tune in to watch Blue Planet, Strictly, & Happy Valley despite "Oneness" and messy trailer endboards.
The type of presentation a channel uses influences the viewers opinion of the channel overall though, as has been documented with the BBC2 rebrand of 1991 seeing viewers describe the same programmes before the revamp as ‘dull and worthy’ and after the revamp as ‘sophisticated, witty, amusing’. It may be an old example but it still rings true.
I wonder if the BBC1 presentation, continuity and general vibe is the reason it is down over 2% on last year's viewing figures and ITV is up by the same amount? The general look and feel of the channel is like Wilko's compared to ITV's WHSmith. Some digital channels fail because they just look bad. BBC1 is going that way in my opinion.
Anyone else often wonder what planet certain posters are living on? Very few people care about TV presentation outside this forum. People still tune in to watch Blue Planet, Strictly, & Happy Valley despite "Oneness" and messy trailer endboards.
The type of presentation a channel uses influences the viewers opinion of the channel overall though, as has been documented with the BBC2 rebrand of 1991 seeing viewers describe the same programmes before the revamp as ‘dull and worthy’ and after the revamp as ‘sophisticated, witty, amusing’. It may be an old example but it still rings true.
Well, in this century, both BBC One & Two placed on YouGov's Top 10 brands of 2017 so poor presentation can't be hindering the wider public s perception of these channels as much as TV Forum likes to claim.
http://www.brandindex.com/ranking/uk/2017-index
Anyone else often wonder what planet certain posters are living on? Very few people care about TV presentation outside this forum. People still tune in to watch Blue Planet, Strictly, & Happy Valley despite "Oneness" and messy trailer endboards.
The type of presentation a channel uses influences the viewers opinion of the channel overall though, as has been documented with the BBC2 rebrand of 1991 seeing viewers describe the same programmes before the revamp as ‘dull and worthy’ and after the revamp as ‘sophisticated, witty, amusing’. It may be an old example but it still rings true.
Well, in this century, both BBC One & Two placed on YouGov's Top 10 brands of 2017 so poor presentation can't be hindering the wider public s perception of these channels as much as TV Forum likes to claim.
http://www.brandindex.com/ranking/uk/2017-index
Of course not, people tune in for programmes not junctions. Content is king, always has been
:-(
A former member
Hence why Granada pres was dire.. There believed the programmes were the presentation or something like that.
Granada wanted the programmes to speak for themselves without having any fancy animated front caps. It was a sensible move until the mid 80s or so when cable channels were having lots of fun with their graphics systems.
"What would it be like if we filmed a whole journey without a script" translates to something like "Let's see if I can get the BBC to give me more money for less work than I'd normally do."
The promo for Britain’s Best Home Cook - how on Earth did having the title, date and time in white text, over Mary Berry’s beige jumper, make it past any sort of quality control?!
