TV Home Forum

BBC Oneness - idents and presentation

"Watch this space" as BBC Creative respond to ident change request (December 2016)

This site closed in March 2021 and is now a read-only archive
JA
james-2001
Next ident revealed:

http://cdn.emgn.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/Addams-Family-Trivia-EMGN4.gif

EDIT: Sorry, just realised it's framed too well.


Too much movement as well! And Gomez looks too happy.
BR
Brekkie
Next ident revealed:

http://cdn.emgn.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/Addams-Family-Trivia-EMGN4.gif

EDIT: Sorry, just realised it's framed too well.

And too much action.

Don't they say the secret of a good photo is actually capturing a moment in action. These are just idents based around people taking bad photos.
RE
Rex
Why is NO one smiling in these other idents, look above, that suppose to be a fun game yet most along with Mountain Rescue look like Southern TV staff on New years eve.

The root problem comes from hiring Parr - he's a photographer, not a cinematographer. The direction in the idents is seriously flawed, not making use of the audiovisual needs of TV, and as a result it's lifeless.

Inching closer to 100 pages...


Yes, producing moving footage to a level of skill above the average Joe Public doesn't seem to be in his skillset, but in order for it to be given the go-ahead, it must go through many others before this current assault on the eyes gets plonked onto the servers for airing.

I suspect batch No.2 will be just as dire and only the ones yet to be filmed have a chance of being reconceived and reworked into something better than originally planned, in direct response to the overwhelmingly negative appraisal of the first batch.

As for the rest of the unfilmed idents - there's a chance that BBC Creative can improve with post processing editing and better camera work - but I'm fearing that it's more likely that they'll keep doing the same drab technique of producing 'oneness idents' with a total lack of quality control, and a touch of derision from viewers, pres fans, and those in the broadcasting industry.
WH
Whataday Founding member
I'm fearing that it's more likely that they'll keep doing the same drab technique of producing 'oneness idents' with a total lack of quality control, and a touch of derision from viewers, pres fans, and those in the broadcasting industry.


Derision?

*
:-(
A former member
We now have 100 page with 10 days, so that been 10 page a day of hate.
NB
NextBigThing
I work for a major UK-based international airline. They have a very strong brand image that they have successfully nurtured and developed over many years so that, over time, it has built-up significant equity. Their brand components are enshrined in a 'brand guidelines' document, which is the bible of how the brand is to be manifested. It contains the logo, corporate font and sub-fonts, colour pallets, written and spoken 'tone of voice' guidelines and detailed instructions of how all of these MUST be used in relation to each other. No deviation from the brand standards is permitted - marketing, airports, aircraft etc must all follow the same strictly unified guidelines. I repeat, they are an AIRLINE - it's their job to fly people safely from A to B. Nevertheless they clearly see the commercial and reputational benefit of taking pride in building a strong and consistent brand proposition. If they (and thousands of other reputable corporations) can do it, why can't an internationally renowned broadcaster, whose whole being and output is solely dedicated to the visual (and audible) mediums?

The airline equivalent of what the BBC have done to their presentation would be: to get on an aircraft with one logo on one side and another (previous) logo on the other, each placed in different positions along the fuselage; then be served by a random set of unsmiling crew all in different uniforms; and none of it bear any resemblance to the brand you saw in the airport. Can you imagine what you'd think of that airline as you're sitting waiting to take off? Professional? Pay attention to the little details? Proud of their image? Safe & secure? No!!
Last edited by NextBigThing on 10 January 2017 11:04pm
RE
Rex
I'm fearing that it's more likely that they'll keep doing the same drab technique of producing 'oneness idents' with a total lack of quality control, and a touch of derision from viewers, pres fans, and those in the broadcasting industry.


Derision?

*

Yep - did mean about people being underwhelmed by the ident set.
DP
D.Page
I'm fearing that it's more likely that they'll keep doing the same drab technique of producing 'oneness idents' with a total lack of quality control, and a touch of derision from viewers, pres fans, and those in the broadcasting industry.


Derision?

*

Yep - did mean about people being underwhelmed by the ident set.


Is his left shoulder on fire?
BE
benriggers
Disgusting that BBC One are showing the swimmers ident for a serious programme about loan sharks. Surely the Capes ident would have been more appropriate?
GL
Gluben
If they (and thousands of other reputable corporations) can do it, why can't an internationally renowned broadcaster, whose whole being and output is solely dedicated to the visual (and audible) mediums?


The thing is, the BBC did do that 20 years ago. After three years, it all fell apart.
GL
Gluben
I'm fearing that it's more likely that they'll keep doing the same drab technique of producing 'oneness idents' with a total lack of quality control, and a touch of derision from viewers, pres fans, and those in the broadcasting industry.


Derision?

*


http://ichef.bbci.co.uk/images/ic/640x360/p0496c1t.jpg
JJ
Juicy Joe Founding member
Nice to see this has hit 100 pages!!

The Radio Times shows a photograph of Parr on a stepladder from behind capturing the exercise class, a different photo than we have seen before.

The viewer that has written in praises the idents and finds them intriguing and asks where the idea came from...

Newer posts