PC
I have felt the same way before - however, it is practically the modern way, regardless. There is more emphasis on the worth of a good TV identity than there ever used to be - remember when symbols were symbols, for the purpose of identification, with little conscious thought about them as a brand. Perhaps just a very general awareness of staying contemporary, or developed to take advantage of something new (in the 80s, contemporary seemed synonymous with hi-tech - hence the first CG symbol on BBC2, and then the COW), but nothing much more.
No-one can argue that any one particular identity can only establish itself as an instantly recognisable or iconic design by allowing it to really root itself into the channel over a number of years. Channel 4 in 1982 and BBC2 in 1991 produced classics that ran for around 14 years and a decade respectively. But they were ground breakers right from the start and redefined the channel identity in their era - it can be said they lasted as long as did because they were designed well enough to do so.
So on the one hand, frequent changes are just a sign of the times - but it may hint that broadcasters are constantly aiming for the next big new concept that really strikes a chord and takes off, like the aforementioned classic Channel 4 and BBC2 examples - until then, they'll probably keep changing at the current rate.
It's fine. Just keep adding to the package with 4 new ones a year. I'm tired of channels in this country constantly rebranding and changing their logos... TV companies are endlessly ditching logos and starting again. It's annoying.
I have felt the same way before - however, it is practically the modern way, regardless. There is more emphasis on the worth of a good TV identity than there ever used to be - remember when symbols were symbols, for the purpose of identification, with little conscious thought about them as a brand. Perhaps just a very general awareness of staying contemporary, or developed to take advantage of something new (in the 80s, contemporary seemed synonymous with hi-tech - hence the first CG symbol on BBC2, and then the COW), but nothing much more.
No-one can argue that any one particular identity can only establish itself as an instantly recognisable or iconic design by allowing it to really root itself into the channel over a number of years. Channel 4 in 1982 and BBC2 in 1991 produced classics that ran for around 14 years and a decade respectively. But they were ground breakers right from the start and redefined the channel identity in their era - it can be said they lasted as long as did because they were designed well enough to do so.
So on the one hand, frequent changes are just a sign of the times - but it may hint that broadcasters are constantly aiming for the next big new concept that really strikes a chord and takes off, like the aforementioned classic Channel 4 and BBC2 examples - until then, they'll probably keep changing at the current rate.
Last edited by Paul Clark on 23 September 2011 3:33pm