If you watch the whole clip, you actually see the second plane hit at 04:59mins, no one commentating
notices, then it's speculated at 07:25 that maybe second building is on fire, due to the original plane passing straight through, it isn't until 10:10 that the clip of plane 2 hitting is (re)shown (introduced as new footage, which it wasn't)
However, it's easy to pick holes with the luxury of examining every frame of a recording 12 years later !
Yes and with the hindsight of what we know now compared with what they knew at the time. It's hard to remember now that at that moment it was just an accident. The idea it was deliberate or that there would be two wasn't even in our minds
The thing that threw them I think was that the live shot of the second plane hitting wasn't actually that obvious and mostly behind the aston. Blink and you miss it stuff. Combine that with them going to the correspondent and all the other chaos that was happening it's not surprising that they missed it. Then were confronted by 2 towers on fire and trying to work out how that happened. That was only confirmed by the 'new footage' which of course they had the luxury of being able to check.
I have seen at least one clip of that incident where a presenter thought that the second plane was actually a replay of the first, despite the fact that there's already smoke. Confusing times
Nothing wrong with that clip at all in the context of the time... except the spelling of Center but that's forgivable!
Last edited by Inspector Sands on 12 December 2013 10:07am - 3 times in total