TV Home Forum

Neighbours

(July 2005)

This site closed in March 2021 and is now a read-only archive
MI
Mich Founding member
plucky duck92 posted:

ABC1 do it over here, although they only have 2 breaks rather than 3 every 30 minutes. (usually: 5, 25, 35, 55mins)

'Spose it has its pros and cons. I like the fact its uninterrupted for the main part of the programme but it gets annoying when there is only a tiny bit of the programme left and they cut to a 4 minute ad break.


I find it really annoying; the novelty of a long interrupted section of the programme isn't special because of the BBC (not ABC1's fault, I know).

I find strange advert timings to be quite disorientating after being used to the traditional UK style - have the OFCOM rules relating to the timings of breaks (and the requirement for them to be be within X minutes of the start/end of a programme) been forgotten?
AM
amosc100
Mich posted:
plucky duck92 posted:

ABC1 do it over here, although they only have 2 breaks rather than 3 every 30 minutes. (usually: 5, 25, 35, 55mins)

'Spose it has its pros and cons. I like the fact its uninterrupted for the main part of the programme but it gets annoying when there is only a tiny bit of the programme left and they cut to a 4 minute ad break.


I find it really annoying; the novelty of a long interrupted section of the programme isn't special because of the BBC (not ABC1's fault, I know).

I find strange advert timings to be quite disorientating after being used to the traditional UK style - have the OFCOM rules relating to the timings of breaks (and the requirement for them to be be within X minutes of the start/end of a programme) been forgotten?


Slightly going off topic but when it comes to the digital channles the TV stations can more or less do what they want - I remember the golden days of Sky 1 (ahhh! the old Neon logo - bring it back, I say, although a certain little bloc on this site don't like the old CG idents) - they had a British Gameshow, "Love At First Sight" - presented by Bruno Brookes, and that had 2 commercial breaks during the 30 minute programme.
DE
derek500
Sorry, staying off topic

Before the Ofcom 20 minute rule was implemented in the early 1990's, Sky used to have two breaks in its 30 minute game shows e.g. The Price is Right and Sale of the Century.

They also used to put three breaks into hour long dramas, but in the correct US fade-outs at 15, 30 & 45 minutes. They ignored the first and last credit breaks.

I'm afraid the Ofcom rules are implemented by stopwatch and sometimes completely mess up the running of programmes, e.g where they cut into the cross scene soundtrack and you can hear one or two notes when they resume.

11 days later

AD
ADDA
Reviving Ramsay Street
TV WEEK finds out how Network Ten plans to put the bubble back into Australia’s longest-running soap

Despite celebrating 20 years on TV and being inducted into the TV WEEK Logies Hall of Fame, Neighbours has recently suffered low ratings and criticism over its storylines. We ask new Network Ten drama executive Dan Bennett what’s being done to entice viewers back to the show.

Obviously the ratings haven’t been good lately.
No, they haven’t. It’s been a bit of a slide over the past six months, or so. It’s not performing as well as we’d like, but the show is not in any danger of being axed.

Why do you think people haven’t been tuning in?
Firstly, the show has perhaps lost its way in terms of storylines. Not all of them, but in a general sense it has drifted away from what has fundamentally been heartland Neighbours. We’ve tried to do more risqué storylines, and Paul’s shenanigans, while very entertaining, at times have pushed the credibility a bit far.

How will you get back to “heartland” Neighbours?
If you had to say what Neighbours is about, it’s a show about friends and family living on a street and dealing with the problems that people face every day. We’re going to make sure from now on that it all comes back to that premise.

Will you change the look of the show?
The simple reality is that Neighbours hasn’t been holding up. It looks very dated. The sets are being revamped, we’ll have new opening titles, we’ve got a new version of the theme… We’re looking at changing the way we shoot and having more location time.

Some big names are leaving soon, like Stephanie McIntosh…
It’s always hard when characters leave, but it’s also important to have a turnover in the cast. Each character has a certain story to tell and there comes a point when those stories have been told.

What can you tell us about the new family set to move in?
There’ll be a mum, dad and kids, and an extended family to join them later. I can’t say exactly who they are, but they are linked to one of the existing residents.

It’d be great if you could introduce Scott and Charlene’s kids!
Scott and Charlene are never very far from anyone’s consciousness, so I’m sure it’s been discussed. That’s a benefit of Neighbours – it has such a rich history. In fact, we’ve just reintroduced a former resident who’s coming back to stick around, so we’ll tell you a little more about that in the coming months.

Will there be another super couple?
Indeed! In fact, there will be more than one super couple.

Some readers have complained that romances don’t last long on the show.
That’s been a really significant problem – the chopping and changing of relationships. The audience hasn’t had time to become invested in any of the pairings before they’ve flitted off with someone else. That’s absolutely being addressed.

SPOILERS
Some of Australia’s most beloved actresses will be joining Neighbours over the next few months, but Dan denies it’s just a ratings stunt. “It’s part of always looking for the best people for the roles,” he insists. “But the added side effect of having such brilliant people is that hopefully the audience will be rushing to switch on as well.”

Keep an eye out for:

Jane Hall “Jane’s just signed on as a series regular,” Dan says. “She’ll play a character with connections to several Ramsay Street residents. And her bombshell will rock the street.”

Penny Cook The former A Country Practice and E Street star will play the guest role of Frazer and Ringo’s mum, Prue, for a few months.

Rachel Gordon “Rachel is playing a role totally different to anything else she’s played and she’s fantastic,” Dan says.

Rowena Wallace Pat the Rat ( Sons and Daughters Veteran).
Rowena Wallace Rowena plays “scary” Mary Casey, who has been living in the suburb for a long time. When she appears she “causes trouble for just about everyone,” laughs Rowena. “But, in a way, you feel very sorry for her.”

Hit and miss
Dan gives his verdict on the recent Neighbours storylines.

The plane crash
“That’s an example of one of the heightened stories that really did work. Apart from delivering a spike in ratings, the effects are still being felt on air!”

Rosie and Pepper’s kiss
“I’ll let the audience decide about that. But it’d be fair to say it was probably a less successful attempt to deal with the issue than the Sky/Lana story a few years ago.”

Paul’s return
“Paul has really breathed new life into the show, but he’s been pushed just about as far as he can be. It’s important to have characters like Paul, but there needs to be a comeuppance.”

Baby Kerry’s leukaemia fight
“That was heartbreaking and worked a treat. The feedback we’ve been getting is great.”

The Timmins family
“It’s been on extreme or the other. As we know, both the boys have finished and Nell (Feeney) and Sianoa (Smit McPhee) finished on set last week. But there’ll always be a Timmins because Janae (Eliza Taylor-Cotter) is sticking around.”

Smile very long indeed!
AD
ADDA
Has anyone registered on the Neighboursfans.com forum?
I can't seem to log on, it says there is a site problem.

Sad
SC
Si-Co
I'm afraid I don't have a source for this, as it was written on another forum.

Quote:
The BBC is facing a three-way battle to keep Neighbours, with ITV and Channel Five considering bidding for the Australian daytime soap.

It is understood the BBC has a period of exclusivity in negotiations for a new contract for the long-running show, but has said it would only commit "if the price was right".

ITV and Channel Five would be keen to get their hands on the soap, with sources confirming they had both run the rule over it.

The soap's current contract with the BBC ends later next year and discussions about a new deal have already begun.

ITV is understood to be considering making a play for the show.

Neighbours would plug a hole in ITV1's afternoon schedule, which has struggled since the loss of Home and Away to Five and the defection of Paul O'Grady to Channel 4.

Neighbours could also be used on ITV2, which is also currently looking for a "teen-oriented soap".

ITV chief operating officer John Cresswell was quoted as saying last week that a teen soap would bring a "habit-forming, young audience" to peak on ITV2.

ITV could follow the lead of Five, which plays Home and Away on its main network at 6pm, then gives viewers a first look at the next episode immediately afterwards on digital channel Five Life.

An ITV spokeswoman said the channel was looking to commission a home-grown series.

Five is also interested in bidding for Neighbours, which it would air alongside Home and Away in a soap hour from 6pm.

The channel has long been interested in acquiring the soap, made by Australian production company Grundy - which is owned by Five's parent company RTL.

The BBC has said it is "committed" to Neighbours, but has denied reports it is preparing to shell out £13m a year to keep it - over three times what it currently pays.

BBC director of acquisitions George McGhee told MediaGuardian.co.uk the corporation wanted to keep the show "but only if the price was right".

He said: "This figure [of £13m a year] is a lot of nonsense. That amount of money would be absolutely ridiculous.

"The BBC is committed to Neighbours but only at the right price."

Negotiations over Neighbours are continuing, although one source said a deal was "still quite some time off", with the BBC holding the rights until well into next year.

Despite its ratings falling from the days of Scott and Charlene's romance and wedding in the late 80s, Neighbours is still a ratings banker for BBC1, pulling in around 3 million viewers for its 1.35pm lunchtime repeat and around 2.6 million for its 5.35pm episode.


Some of the above may be old news, but I had no idea ITV were considering purchasing Neighbours.
JE
Jez Founding member
I heard that Five were keen on getting Neighbours a while ago but didnt realise ITV also wanted it.

Mind you, ITV have shown practically every other Aussie soap from Home and Away to Prisoner Cell Block H!
DA
Davidjb Founding member
Neighbours cannot leave the BBC. It just would not be Neighbours anymore if it did!
AD
ADDA
MediaGuardian.co.uk
The BBC is facing a three-way battle to keep Neighbours, with ITV and Channel Five considering bidding for the Australian daytime soap.

It is understood the BBC has a period of exclusivity in negotiations for a new contract for the long-running show, but has said it would only commit "if the price was right".

ITV and Channel Five would be keen to get their hands on the soap, with sources confirming they had both run the rule over it.

The soap's current contract with the BBC ends later next year and discussions about a new deal have already begun.

ITV is understood to be considering making a play for the show.

Neighbours would plug a hole in ITV1's afternoon schedule, which has struggled since the loss of Home and Away to Five and the defection of Paul O'Grady to Channel 4.

Neighbours could also be used on ITV2, which is also currently looking for a "teen-oriented soap".

ITV chief operating officer John Cresswell was quoted as saying last week that a teen soap would bring a "habit-forming, young audience" to peak on ITV2.

ITV could follow the lead of Five, which plays Home and Away on its main network at 6pm, then gives viewers a first look at the next episode immediately afterwards on digital channel Five Life.

An ITV spokeswoman said the channel was looking to commission a home-grown series.

Five is also interested in bidding for Neighbours, which it would air alongside Home and Away in a soap hour from 6pm.

The channel has long been interested in acquiring the soap, made by Australian production company Grundy - which is owned by Five's parent company RTL.

The BBC has said it is "committed" to Neighbours, but has denied reports it is preparing to shell out £13m a year to keep it - over three times what it currently pays.

BBC director of acquisitions George McGhee told MediaGuardian.co.uk the corporation wanted to keep the show "but only if the price was right".

He said: "This figure [of £13m a year] is a lot of nonsense. That amount of money would be absolutely ridiculous.

"The BBC is committed to Neighbours but only at the right price."

Negotiations over Neighbours are continuing, although one source said a deal was "still quite some time off", with the BBC holding the rights until well into next year.

Despite its ratings falling from the days of Scott and Charlene's romance and wedding in the late 80s, Neighbours is still a ratings banker for BBC1, pulling in around 3 million viewers for its 1.35pm lunchtime repeat and around 2.6 million for its 5.35pm episode.
AD
ADDA
Contact the BBC telling them to do everything their can to keep Neighbours on the BBC!
ST
Stuart
I read this at work (honest I was doing stuff at the time too) and I reckon five will get it since they are owned by the same parent company that makes it. Although I thought BBC funded alot of it anyway, so RTL would have to stump up all the costs themselves then.
SC
Si-Co
This is also being discussed in the Neighbours thread.

Just trying to avoid duplicate discussions . not trying to 'moderate' Wink

Newer posts