CF
One of my friends has appeared on Ministry Of Mayhem, but easily prefers Dick and Dom in Da Bungalow, it was simply more entertaining. Spelling competitions or "You'll never do that with a carcass on your hands"? I know what I prefer.
That was when it was towards the start of the show, but by the end it was very good (this is not including Showdown). The spelling competition disappeared way before the first revamp, and following that was just fun and light hearted games where they didn't try to be funny, but it worked and was entertaining.
When I saw Stephen Mulhern and Holly Willoughby trying to be amusing, they were trying to shoehorn in adult innuendoes in the most unsubtle way, and dying on their butts for it.
I'd rather it wasn't in a subtle manner, because if it was it would be sometimes hard to notice. Stephen Mulhern was pathetic at them, but Holly was great particularly as they often exploited her sexual appeal to make some of them. Holly did do quite a few innuendos quite well such as this one:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ofq1nfAlGzA
Both shows were just as good as eachother (as ratings will show in the last 6 months of 2005) so its down to a matter of opinion of which show is better. Its either 2 fully grown men running about acting like kids or a multi layered magazine show with a fit presenter.
Peter Thomas posted:
One of my friends has appeared on Ministry Of Mayhem, but easily prefers Dick and Dom in Da Bungalow, it was simply more entertaining. Spelling competitions or "You'll never do that with a carcass on your hands"? I know what I prefer.
That was when it was towards the start of the show, but by the end it was very good (this is not including Showdown). The spelling competition disappeared way before the first revamp, and following that was just fun and light hearted games where they didn't try to be funny, but it worked and was entertaining.
Quote:
When I saw Stephen Mulhern and Holly Willoughby trying to be amusing, they were trying to shoehorn in adult innuendoes in the most unsubtle way, and dying on their butts for it.
I'd rather it wasn't in a subtle manner, because if it was it would be sometimes hard to notice. Stephen Mulhern was pathetic at them, but Holly was great particularly as they often exploited her sexual appeal to make some of them. Holly did do quite a few innuendos quite well such as this one:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ofq1nfAlGzA
Both shows were just as good as eachother (as ratings will show in the last 6 months of 2005) so its down to a matter of opinion of which show is better. Its either 2 fully grown men running about acting like kids or a multi layered magazine show with a fit presenter.