KE
kez19
The closure of the +1 channels will save a bit of transponder space, transponders that are leased from SES (Astra) which costs money. The removal of HD channels that's been happening lately also save space.
Sky in Germany has been doing a similar thing: https://rethinkresearch.biz/articles/sky-deutschland-signs-dth-death-sentence-with-channel-cull/
Sky is focusing on-demand content more and more as OTT doesn't have the usual transmission cost overheads, this includes streaming linear channels. They're gradually moving towards where Sky without a dish will probably be the only option.
On a quick count, Sky has around 70 +1 timeshift channels, Virgin has around 45.
https://rxtvinfo.com/sky-channel-list-uk
https://www.virginmedia.com/content/dam/virginmedia/dotcom/documents/Redwood/ChannelGuide_1_July_2020.pdf
Sky in Germany has been doing a similar thing: https://rethinkresearch.biz/articles/sky-deutschland-signs-dth-death-sentence-with-channel-cull/
Sky is focusing on-demand content more and more as OTT doesn't have the usual transmission cost overheads, this includes streaming linear channels. They're gradually moving towards where Sky without a dish will probably be the only option.
On a quick count, Sky has around 70 +1 timeshift channels, Virgin has around 45.
https://rxtvinfo.com/sky-channel-list-uk
https://www.virginmedia.com/content/dam/virginmedia/dotcom/documents/Redwood/ChannelGuide_1_July_2020.pdf
What happens with the empty spaces will they be used again (for other channels if they do launch which probably won't be) or does it go back towards bandwidth for on demand (I have no clue in this part), i'm always familar with channels closing/launching but with the closures its going to leave holes but on the other maybe more of an alignment?