TV Home Forum

Mpeg - Killing Quality.

(November 2003)

This site closed in March 2021 and is now a read-only archive
NG
noggin Founding member
The Nurse posted:
noggin posted:
I think that you aren't fairly comparing like with like.


So maybe it's not a fair technical comparison but he is comparing like-for-like given that they are both forms of domestic TV transmissions. If Joe Public goes out and buys a massive 69" Plamsa telly only to discover that when he gets it home the allegedly soon-to-be-turned-off analogue picture looks better than digital then he's not really going to care that if they used the full bandwitdh it would look good.

There's a lot of talk about this HDTV satellite, but what channels are actually going to be on it?!


Yep - as broadcast UK MPEG2 may be worse than UK PAL - but in other countries the PAL broadcasts will look massively worse than our MPEG2, and MPEG2 in other countries beats our PAL... I agree that the artefacts on PAL transmissions are less objectionable to many than those on UK MPEG2 - and UK MPEG2 could look better - but that is not what Mark wrote.

On the other hand an off-air PAL signal fed into a 60" plasma will also look pretty awful. The subcarrier artefacts will be huge - as will the cross colour effects - and even with high-end decoders (which many plasmas don't employ because they are designed more for RGB/Component feeds) the pictures still look pretty awful. The major problem with modern plasmas and 100Hz TVs and digital broadcasts is that the cheap interlace->progressive or field doubling processing used is very poor quality - and adds artefacts of its own to the received picture. There are very few plasmas that will display a 625/50 picture as cleanly as a CRT based system - believe me I've looked at a lot - from 32" to 61" models from the major manufacturers...

As for EuroHD carrying "channels" - it isn't like that - it will be offering two channels of its own. The Main channel - which will be FTA - and the Event channel - which will be encrypted. The Main channel will show 4 hours of material a day, repeated 3 times. The Event channel will not be a subscription channel as such - instead it will be used to broadcast events to specific locations who will be authorised to decrypt the broadcasts.

The Main channel will mainly broadcast programme that are being recorded by broadcasters in HDTV for archive / sale purposes - such as opera, ballet, music concerts etc. Sport is a possibility if rights issues are sorted. The BBC certainly shoot most of their high-end classical music (apart from the Barbican stuff) on HDTV these days. The Last Night of the Proms has been HD for a few years (Japanese broadcasters pay for the HD bit I think) - as are many major classical concerts shot by European PSBs. It is less likely that films and drama will be shown - as there is much less HD drama production by PSBs in Europe - and I doubt EuroHD will be able to sort film deals with Hollywood! The USP for this channel initially will be the quality rather than the content I fear...

Given that high-end plasmas and projectors sold in Europe are already HDTV ready, and show up the compression artefacts of SDTV digital transmissions, there may be a small (but big enough) market within the home cinema community.

The Event channel run by Euro1080 will be available to event producers who wish to make their events available to a wider audience than can attend a venue in person. eCinemas and Pubs/Clubs will be able to be authorised to decrypt the Event channel to show live pop-concerts etc. to their customers. This is happening already - a David Bowie concert was shown across Europe in eCinemas recently. (Though not via Euro1080 AIUI)

What you won't get on Euro1080 is an HDTV SkyOne, or an HDTV BBC Four...
AD
Adamski
I find all this talk of the methods of broadcasting digital signals really interesting but don't know much about it so to avoid asking someone to explain it all, is there a good website that has a guide to how digital broadcasting actually works (whether television or radio)? I'm doing a degree in music technology so I understand the various MPEG formats to an extent but all the talk of multiplexes leaves me a bit baffled.

Thanks!
CT
Carlton Television Ltd
Adamski posted:
I find all this talk of the methods of broadcasting digital signals really interesting but don't know much about it so to avoid asking someone to explain it all, is there a good website that has a guide to how digital broadcasting actually works (whether television or radio)? I'm doing a degree in music technology so I understand the various MPEG formats to an extent but all the talk of multiplexes leaves me a bit baffled.

Thanks!

Theres a great site explaining everything about digital TV. Including MPEG-2 Compression.
Heres a link
HowStuffWorks - Digital TV


Carlton Wink
MB
Mark Boulton
Quote:
I agree that the artefacts on PAL transmissions are less objectionable to many than those on UK MPEG2 - and UK MPEG2 could look better - but that is not what Mark wrote.


So sorry Noggin. Would you like me to preface all my posts with a couple of pages of Terms & Definitions, just to clarify the obvious, just to stop pedantic obstenance?

I think you knew full well what I was talking about, but just for some reason didn't want to agree.

The fact remains. On a bog standard but fairly decent quality domestic TV set, CRT-based (as mine is), average sized screen, the analogue picture is EASIER to watch than a digital picture because the artefacts on analogue do not distract as much as on digital. That fact remains and whereas you said I wasn't comparing like-with-like, I think referring to HDTV systems and even MPEG2/PAL systems from abroad is as far from a like-for-like comparison than one can get.
NG
noggin Founding member
Mark Boulton posted:
Quote:
I agree that the artefacts on PAL transmissions are less objectionable to many than those on UK MPEG2 - and UK MPEG2 could look better - but that is not what Mark wrote.


So sorry Noggin. Would you like me to preface all my posts with a couple of pages of Terms & Definitions, just to clarify the obvious, just to stop pedantic obstenance?

I think you knew full well what I was talking about, but just for some reason didn't want to agree.

The fact remains. On a bog standard but fairly decent quality domestic TV set, CRT-based (as mine is), average sized screen, the analogue picture is EASIER to watch than a digital picture because the artefacts on analogue do not distract as much as on digital. That fact remains and whereas you said I wasn't comparing like-with-like, I think referring to HDTV systems and even MPEG2/PAL systems from abroad is as far from a like-for-like comparison than one can get.


Yep - but equally to tar all MPEG2 systems with a "poorer than PAL" brush without qualification is misleading and inaccurate. I don't think ensuring others don't make that assumption is pedantic - though you are more than free to disagree. As for the systems used metioned - MPEG2 is used at 18Mbs in Beta SX, 50Mbs in IMX and other broadcast systems, 8Mbs for some broadcast links etc. - all of which are used in the UK. It was only the bit rate comparison with HD that is really based on systems used abroad (though Euro HD is receivable in the UK)

Newer posts