TV Home Forum

Go compare Adverts

Whats happening? from 2nd July 2012. (June 2012)

This site closed in March 2021 and is now a read-only archive
SW
SWatson7
Maybe the next stage of the advert could be to send Sue round to the houses of the 43 people who complained and blow them up as well. I know its pot, kettle coming from a poster on TV Forum but some people really do need to get a life.
AM
amosc100
No doubt ASA will uphold the complaints and ban the advert!

I just hope not
RO
roo
Well I see Daily Mail have been unable to resist inserting "BBC" into their own article...
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2169157/Go-Compare-advert-Parents-complain-BBCs-Sue-Barker-blowing-opera-singer-latest-TV-commercial.html

Presumably those complaining ignored the last few seconds which clearly shows he's alive and wasn't "blown up". At the end of the day no publicity is bad publicity and these articles complaining about the ad simply provide more publicity for the company/service.


Curious URL.
DO
dosxuk
Well I see Daily Mail have been unable to resist inserting "BBC" into their own article...
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2169157/Go-Compare-advert-Parents-complain-BBCs-Sue-Barker-blowing-opera-singer-latest-TV-commercial.html

Presumably those complaining ignored the last few seconds which clearly shows he's alive and wasn't "blown up". At the end of the day no publicity is bad publicity and these articles complaining about the ad simply provide more publicity for the company/service.


Curious URL.


Well you could replace it with http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2169157/Daily-Mail-creates-mountain-out-of-molehile-over-tennis-stars-shooting.html
DA
davidhorman


Curious URL.


It's all the rage. Cheap'n'easy way of getting yourself up the search ladder.

Or maybe you were just referring to this snippet:

Quote:
Sue-Barker-blowing-opera-singer


David
VM
VMPhil
They've now edited the advert so that, instead of him crawling out at the very end of the advert, he now crawls out straight after the explosion scene, before Sue reveals her identity.
GS
Gavin Scott Founding member
They've now edited the advert so that, instead of him crawling out at the very end of the advert, he now crawls out straight after the explosion scene, before Sue reveals her identity.


Pathetic.

It was already a pretty feeble idea. "Annoying character gets blown up with bazooka".

How much did the new agency take for that wheeze?
JB
JasonB
There was nothing wrong with the original. Rolling Eyes
DA
davidmcg
I think the ad is great, riding on the annoyance the character has caused for most watchers. If only Compare the Market could do the same, their ads are terrible now.
LL
Larry the Loafer
They've now edited the advert so that, instead of him crawling out at the very end of the advert, he now crawls out straight after the explosion scene, before Sue reveals her identity.


I don't understand how that solves matters. If anything, it's reinforcing that he's survived - most people will probably see the Go Compare endcap and assume the ad's finished.
GS
Gavin Scott Founding member
They've now edited the advert so that, instead of him crawling out at the very end of the advert, he now crawls out straight after the explosion scene, before Sue reveals her identity.


I don't understand how that solves matters. If anything, it's reinforcing that he's survived - most people will probably see the Go Compare endcap and assume the ad's finished.


Well, no, that's not really the vernacular of these narrative-led ads, is it?

As its being presented as a story, particularly one which spans several slots within a junction, people will stay tuned to see the little epilogue. Some people may be thick, but if they know anything it's the language of television.

What its done is to indicate that Sue Barker is laughing at having blown Gio into a crater - NOT that she has successfully terminated him.

I mean - the whole conceit of the ad is that she's out to kill him; and they've gone and wrecked it because of the complaints of a few morons who probably find Tom & Jerry too violent.

When you get into analysing an ad campaign because of the creative flaws in it (as opposed to being "annoyed" by its theme or something), then its not working.
KE
kernow
I think the ad is great, riding on the annoyance the character has caused for most watchers. If only Compare the Market could do the same, their ads are terrible now.

Are you saying that someone should try and kill off the meerkats?

If they did, there would probably be a lot more complaints about it (even though they aren't real meerkats) than the Go Compare advert.

Newer posts