TV Home Forum

Log Of The New Idents On BBC-1

Just For The First Few Days (October 2006)

This site closed in March 2021 and is now a read-only archive
DO
thedoctorandmartha
multi channel thing just shown with new idents but old logo

hippos into Incredible Animal Journeys
PS
Paul_S_UK
thedoctorandmartha posted:
multi channel thing just shown with new idents but old logo

hippos into Incredible Animal Journeys


It was the 'old red box' containing the new "BBC one" typography.
DO
thedoctorandmartha
anyone capture it?
MB
MalcyB
.
DO
thedoctorandmartha
MalcyB posted:
Can we have some volunteers please to keep the log running tomorrow. If anything, just to see when the first airing of SURFERS and WINDOWS will be?
I can video tonight's overnight activities if anyone runs out of steam!
Thanks.


I can't but I am taping overnight and in the day tommorow.
MA
marksi
tvarksouthwest posted:
Well I'm sorry, but this guy is representing the BBC's flagship channel so yes it is relevant. I get called all sorts on this forum for my stance on drugs but I stand by it. And while we're here, Graham Norton should have got a kick up the behind.


I'm glad Zammo's story had an impact on you. As to Mr Norton, what gets near his behind is his own business and no one elses.

If you took all the people off TV who take/have taken drugs I suspect you'd end up with the test card on screen most of the day.

Is that what you want?

Oh. Wait... Rolling Eyes
:-(
A former member
Not true at all. It's only a handful.
GS
Gavin Scott Founding member
Joe Havard posted:
Not true at all. It's only a handful.


Wrong.

Stop categorically stating things when you are merely hazarding a guess. It really shows you up.
MD
mdtauk
http://www.rp-networkservices.com/tvforum/uploads/multibbc.jpg

I wish I could get a hold of that BBC One font. I can do those regional logos and correct the logo I drew!
:-(
A former member
Gavin Scott posted:
Joe Havard posted:
Not true at all. It's only a handful.


Wrong.

Stop categorically stating things when you are merely hazarding a guess. It really shows you up.


You what? I was not hazarding a guess at all.

YOU'RE the one who shows me up Gavin.
GS
Gavin Scott Founding member
Joe Havard posted:
Gavin Scott posted:
Joe Havard posted:
Not true at all. It's only a handful.


Wrong.

Stop categorically stating things when you are merely hazarding a guess. It really shows you up.


You what? I was not hazarding a guess at all.

YOU'RE the one who shows me up Gavin.


Have you worked in the entertainment industry, Joe? I fail to recall seeing that in your online resume you provided the other week.

In my brief time working in both the talent and technical side of the industry I have met more than a "handful" of people who wouldn't say no to a drink, a smoke, a line or a pill. You're the medicine man here so no doubt you don't need clarification that no one is suggesting everyone is a junkie with a needle in their arm.

I really have no idea why you would even *think* you are correct, so perhaps you could enlighten us.

And by the way; I'd prefer not to receive any more PM's from you demanding explanations of why I would "rubbish" your rubbish.
:-(
A former member
Gavin Scott posted:
Joe Havard posted:
Gavin Scott posted:
Joe Havard posted:
Not true at all. It's only a handful.


Wrong.

Stop categorically stating things when you are merely hazarding a guess. It really shows you up.


You what? I was not hazarding a guess at all.

YOU'RE the one who shows me up Gavin.


Have you worked in the entertainment industry, Joe? I fail to recall seeing that in your online resume you provided the other week.

In my brief time working in both the talent and technical side of the industry I have met more than a "handful" of people who wouldn't say no to a drink, a smoke, a line or a pill. You're the medicine man here so no doubt you don't need clarification that no one is suggesting everyone is a junkie with a needle in their arm.

I really have no idea why you would even *think* you are correct, so perhaps you could enlighten us.

And by the way; I'd prefer not to receive any more PM's from you demanding explanations of why I would "rubbish" your rubbish.


Oh I give up with you.

Newer posts