NG
Do you really think they'd be doing it if it didn't technically meet the news remit?
They are trying to do anything to get an audience, and thus ad revenue, for their news output (which they have to have for PSB licence reasons) - and nothing is working for them (having a tiny budget can't help...)
I'm sure they'd drop it like a stone if they could replace it with something cheaper and/or bought in.
noggin
Founding member
I think Studio Five has had a bit of a raw deal. I had my reservations about the show at first but I think its actually grown into an alright show. I don't watch it all the time but its something to watch when there is nothing else on. But the reason I think it has had a raw deal is because it replaced Five News and it was originally billed as a news debate show. What Five
should
have done is had a Five Newshour at 5pm with Studio Five at 7pm for an hour. Then if the Five Newshour didn't work, ditch it and put it back to half an hour but without reinstating the 7pm bulletin. Thats the problem- on its own its quite a good show, it just isn't filling the news remit very well.
Do you really think they'd be doing it if it didn't technically meet the news remit?
They are trying to do anything to get an audience, and thus ad revenue, for their news output (which they have to have for PSB licence reasons) - and nothing is working for them (having a tiny budget can't help...)
I'm sure they'd drop it like a stone if they could replace it with something cheaper and/or bought in.