GS
In your opinion.
Not one held by Jonathan himself, or indeed anyone involved.
That said, the matter has been dealt with and should be laid to rest, as far as I'm concerned.
Gavin Scott
Founding member
Brekkie posted:
I've never been a fan of Jonathan Ross but millions are and he's done absolutely nothing wrong here.
In your opinion.
Not one held by Jonathan himself, or indeed anyone involved.
That said, the matter has been dealt with and should be laid to rest, as far as I'm concerned.
SH
In your opinion.
Not one held by Jonathan himself, or indeed anyone involved.
That said, the matter has been dealt with and should be laid to rest, as far as I'm concerned.
Why should it ?
There are many people who believe he got off very lightly and that apart from the enforced apology doesn't appear to show any signs of contrition.
It also raises important questions about how our licence fee is spent and how the BBC contracts-out programmes to commercial organisations.
I would have thought an internet forum devoted to discussion about matters pertaining to television would be a perfect place for such a continued debate.
Unless you think something like the end of Heartbeat is a much more important issue.
Gavin Scott posted:
Brekkie posted:
I've never been a fan of Jonathan Ross but millions are and he's done absolutely nothing wrong here.
In your opinion.
Not one held by Jonathan himself, or indeed anyone involved.
That said, the matter has been dealt with and should be laid to rest, as far as I'm concerned.
Why should it ?
There are many people who believe he got off very lightly and that apart from the enforced apology doesn't appear to show any signs of contrition.
It also raises important questions about how our licence fee is spent and how the BBC contracts-out programmes to commercial organisations.
I would have thought an internet forum devoted to discussion about matters pertaining to television would be a perfect place for such a continued debate.
Unless you think something like the end of Heartbeat is a much more important issue.
GS
I disagree, I thought it did.
Go right ahead then. I think you're getting a little cross that people seem not to agree with what you have to say. Certainly no one is treading on your right to an opinion. I simply don't share it.
Oh spare us the nonsense, dear. If you have a point to make, make it.
Gavin Scott
Founding member
Showbizguru posted:
Why should it ?
There are many people who believe he got off very lightly and that apart from the enforced apology doesn't appear to show any signs of contrition.
There are many people who believe he got off very lightly and that apart from the enforced apology doesn't appear to show any signs of contrition.
I disagree, I thought it did.
Quote:
It also raises important questions about how our licence fee is spent and how the BBC contracts-out programmes to commercial organisations.
I would have thought an internet forum devoted to discussion about matters pertaining to television would be a perfect place for such a continued debate.
I would have thought an internet forum devoted to discussion about matters pertaining to television would be a perfect place for such a continued debate.
Go right ahead then. I think you're getting a little cross that people seem not to agree with what you have to say. Certainly no one is treading on your right to an opinion. I simply don't share it.
Quote:
Unless you think something like the end of Heartbeat is a much more important issue.
Oh spare us the nonsense, dear. If you have a point to make, make it.
SH
I disagree, I thought it did.
Go right ahead then. I think you're getting a little cross that people seem not to agree with what you have to say. Certainly no one is treading on your right to an opinion. I simply don't share it.
Oh spare us the nonsense, dear. If you have a point to make, make it.
Steady on old son - we wouldn't want you to get banned for being abusive to another poster now would we !
Gavin Scott posted:
Showbizguru posted:
Why should it ?
There are many people who believe he got off very lightly and that apart from the enforced apology doesn't appear to show any signs of contrition.
There are many people who believe he got off very lightly and that apart from the enforced apology doesn't appear to show any signs of contrition.
I disagree, I thought it did.
Quote:
It also raises important questions about how our licence fee is spent and how the BBC contracts-out programmes to commercial organisations.
I would have thought an internet forum devoted to discussion about matters pertaining to television would be a perfect place for such a continued debate.
I would have thought an internet forum devoted to discussion about matters pertaining to television would be a perfect place for such a continued debate.
Go right ahead then. I think you're getting a little cross that people seem not to agree with what you have to say. Certainly no one is treading on your right to an opinion. I simply don't share it.
Quote:
Unless you think something like the end of Heartbeat is a much more important issue.
Oh spare us the nonsense, dear. If you have a point to make, make it.
Steady on old son - we wouldn't want you to get banned for being abusive to another poster now would we !
GS
Well, some may consider it a small price to pay.
Gavin Scott
Founding member
Showbizguru posted:
Steady on old son - we wouldn't want you to get banned for being abusive to another poster now would we !
Well, some may consider it a small price to pay.
IS
His actual take-home pay isn't a matter of public record as he's paid by a private company
A private company owned by ....
A private company owned by him and his wife.
The BBC pays the company money for the 3 series and his company pays him and everyone else involved.
Therefore he is paid by his own company and that amount is not publicly known
Showbizguru posted:
Inspector Sands posted:
His actual take-home pay isn't a matter of public record as he's paid by a private company
A private company owned by ....
A private company owned by him and his wife.
The BBC pays the company money for the 3 series and his company pays him and everyone else involved.
Therefore he is paid by his own company and that amount is not publicly known
SH
Well, some may consider it a small price to pay.
You mean the remainder of the clique ...
Gavin Scott posted:
Showbizguru posted:
Steady on old son - we wouldn't want you to get banned for being abusive to another poster now would we !
Well, some may consider it a small price to pay.
You mean the remainder of the clique ...
IS
Why should it ?
There are many people who believe he got off very lightly
You do know what he did don't you?
He didn't murder children
He didn't drown kittens
He didn't burn down a factory.
He said 4 words down a telephone on someone elses radio show... that's all
How heavy should the punishment be exactly?
Showbizguru posted:
Why should it ?
There are many people who believe he got off very lightly
You do know what he did don't you?
He didn't murder children
He didn't drown kittens
He didn't burn down a factory.
He said 4 words down a telephone on someone elses radio show... that's all
How heavy should the punishment be exactly?
JA
Well, some may consider it a small price to pay.
You mean the remainder of the clique ...
As far as I can see, Mr Scott is behaving like a perfect gentleman, and you are acting up like a bitter old queen. You're making a fool of no-one but yourself, so unless you'd like to contribute to the entertainment of everyone whom you aggrivate on the forum, I'd urge you to stop.
Showbizguru posted:
Gavin Scott posted:
Showbizguru posted:
Steady on old son - we wouldn't want you to get banned for being abusive to another poster now would we !
Well, some may consider it a small price to pay.
You mean the remainder of the clique ...
As far as I can see, Mr Scott is behaving like a perfect gentleman, and you are acting up like a bitter old queen. You're making a fool of no-one but yourself, so unless you'd like to contribute to the entertainment of everyone whom you aggrivate on the forum, I'd urge you to stop.
IS
Oh no no no no no no no no
(what are you on about?)
Showbizguru posted:
And here come the nodding dogs in the back of the car in front.
Oh no no no no no no no no
(what are you on about?)