JO
When I read you OP I thought you must have been talking about +1, anyway it happen often when they only have the rights for something on the one show or at a certain time.
must have been the previous programme on ITV2+1 helping hati, everybody hurts
When I read you OP I thought you must have been talking about +1, anyway it happen often when they only have the rights for something on the one show or at a certain time.
NJ
Not really. It was pretty common when ITV2+1 launched. Some bright spark at ITV thought it was a good idea to launch a timeshift channel when you have next to nothing that could be timeshifted... The same thing happened with ITV3+1 initially, though finally somebody finally did the homework BEFORE launching ITV4+1. Heaven knows what's going to happen if ITV1+1 does launch...
Neil Jones
Founding member
sounds daft to plan to show it if legally you can't 
Not really. It was pretty common when ITV2+1 launched. Some bright spark at ITV thought it was a good idea to launch a timeshift channel when you have next to nothing that could be timeshifted... The same thing happened with ITV3+1 initially, though finally somebody finally did the homework BEFORE launching ITV4+1. Heaven knows what's going to happen if ITV1+1 does launch...
TV
You'd expect them to be able to show that given Cowell is behind it and that its for charity.
must have been the previous programme on ITV2+1 helping hati, everybody hurts
You'd expect them to be able to show that given Cowell is behind it and that its for charity.
DA
For charity, The Sun and Cowell. It would be nice if the 'legal' reasons was because Ofcom stepped in to stop it as being nothing more than an advert but I doubt they have.
You'd expect them to be able to show that given Cowell is behind it and that its for charity.
For charity, The Sun and Cowell. It would be nice if the 'legal' reasons was because Ofcom stepped in to stop it as being nothing more than an advert but I doubt they have.