PA
Actually if you did a bit of research instead of spouting baseless criticism, you would find response to the new ITV News site has been overwhelmingly positive. The same applies for the new Sport site. I'm not going to spoon feed you links to sources - try Googling it and you'll find articles on several media websites supporting this with real numbers. 4 months into the new News site it was attracting more visitors in a day than the old site was in a month. So yes, I would call it fantastic.
Criticising ITV is a bit like bullying the fat kid at school, which seems to be more like your playschool comment than an entirely valid question as to why a network rebranding exercise was postponed as much as 3 months. I wouldn't call my questioning of it a tantrum, either.
Anyway, since your comments are so incredibly tedious to me and seemingly mine are to you, I suggest we stop conversing altogether.
I think ITV is making great strides with both its programming and online divisions and while there is much work to do I am looking forward to the Winter schedules with shows like Mrs Biggs, Downton Abbey, Mr Selfridge and The Scapegoat looking incredibly promising.
ITV.com is still in regeneration and if the rest of the site follows in the ilk of ITV News and Sport it will be very good. I'm looking forward to the new ITV Player.
As for the presentation revamp, it is welcomed and I'm glad ITV are putting a lot of effort into this rebrand. I have a lot more faith in the team behind this one than the team who were in place for the 2006 rebranding. I'd like to be positive about it and criticise when it arrives if it's sh!te.
Oh my word. ITV News website? Fantastic? I suppose you can grow from nothing can't you 
Where are these figures btw?
Of course this forum is about presentation, not disputing that, but to throw a tantrum when there may be good reason behind a delay........ Talk about presentation, sure, but not at the cost of a sound argument. That's playschool.
Where are these figures btw?
Of course this forum is about presentation, not disputing that, but to throw a tantrum when there may be good reason behind a delay........ Talk about presentation, sure, but not at the cost of a sound argument. That's playschool.
Actually if you did a bit of research instead of spouting baseless criticism, you would find response to the new ITV News site has been overwhelmingly positive. The same applies for the new Sport site. I'm not going to spoon feed you links to sources - try Googling it and you'll find articles on several media websites supporting this with real numbers. 4 months into the new News site it was attracting more visitors in a day than the old site was in a month. So yes, I would call it fantastic.
Criticising ITV is a bit like bullying the fat kid at school, which seems to be more like your playschool comment than an entirely valid question as to why a network rebranding exercise was postponed as much as 3 months. I wouldn't call my questioning of it a tantrum, either.
Anyway, since your comments are so incredibly tedious to me and seemingly mine are to you, I suggest we stop conversing altogether.
I think ITV is making great strides with both its programming and online divisions and while there is much work to do I am looking forward to the Winter schedules with shows like Mrs Biggs, Downton Abbey, Mr Selfridge and The Scapegoat looking incredibly promising.
ITV.com is still in regeneration and if the rest of the site follows in the ilk of ITV News and Sport it will be very good. I'm looking forward to the new ITV Player.
As for the presentation revamp, it is welcomed and I'm glad ITV are putting a lot of effort into this rebrand. I have a lot more faith in the team behind this one than the team who were in place for the 2006 rebranding. I'd like to be positive about it and criticise when it arrives if it's sh!te.
