Some media rebranding suit is probably getting paid thousands for this.
A stupid move now IMO - although I never saw the need to introduce the "1" in the first place, a decade and more on with "ITV" being a much bigger operation than when "ITV1" was introduced it just seems a ridiculous decision to scrap the brand just as it's pretty much established itself.
Not really sure what to make of it, but assuming it does go back to good old ITV, then the logo will have to be capitialised, as the current logo doesn't look right on it's own, it just looks weak and having no confidence, but the current logo was designed to have numbers and names next to the lower case ITV logo. I'd like them to take a leaf from 1989, but I doubt that would happen.
Do you think STV and UTV may accept this rebrand? If it is good enough?
There'll be no ITV branding on STV and UTV so long as they remain independent of ITVplc, purely because it's no longer a regionally neutral brand. Both companies contested Granada & Carlton's decision to call the product company of their merger 'ITV' but this failed; probably because since 1993, the legal collective name for the regional licences has been 'Channel 3'.
Do you think STV and UTV may accept this rebrand? If it is good enough?
There'll be no ITV branding on STV and UTV so long as they remain independent of ITVplc, purely because it's no longer a regionally neutral brand. Both companies contested Granada & Carlton's decision to call the product company of their merger 'ITV' but this failed; probably because since 1993, the legal collective name for the regional licences has been 'Channel 3'.
No, they will probably keep it during Daybreak from 6am to 9.25am, but that will be it. And maybe at the weekends for 'Payback'.