CH
If I were a betting person my money would be on this to fail and another relaunch at some point within the next few years. That could be anything from 6 months to 6 years. There are always some companies with more resources than sense and this lot seem to be one of them.
They'd be far better off evolving the current brand, giving each station a clear focus. I get the oddest feeling that the huge amount of repeats of repeats and blocks of 4 and 5 hours of the Chase and tipping point will return within months (if they disappear at all)
RTE2 becoming Network 2 was genius in 1988. Up to that point, RTE2 was a backwater of a channel that was hardly watched in multi-Channel homes. Switching Kids and Sports to the Channel grew the audience and presentation improved greatly. It also allowed RTE1 to have programmes aimed at adults between 4 and 6, At that time the only real competition for that audience was Channel 4, BBC1 and ITV had kids programmes and Neighbours/Home and away.
It also marked the start of a time in the station when presentation improved. I remember talking to someone that had to represent RTE at EBU meetings saying that the 1989 News presentation was the first time he wasn't embarrassed by what RTE were producing in their News studio. Many times in the 80's their presentation looked like something from the early 1960's.
Is it wrong of me to kind of *want* this rebrand to fail?
IMHO, it reeks of vanity on Virgin Media Ireland's part more than anything else - even more so than when Central and Westcountry were Carltonised. (Indeed, in Central's case, the name change didn't exactly come out of the blue.)
It also makes far less sense than RTÉ2 becoming Network 2 in 1988 (and then becoming RTÉ2 again in 2004), or Antenne 2 and FR3 becoming France 2 and France 3 respectively in 1992.
And I know TV channels and confections are not the same thing at all - but this rebrand even makes less sense than Opal Fruits and Marathon becoming Starburst and Snickers respectively...
IMHO, it reeks of vanity on Virgin Media Ireland's part more than anything else - even more so than when Central and Westcountry were Carltonised. (Indeed, in Central's case, the name change didn't exactly come out of the blue.)
It also makes far less sense than RTÉ2 becoming Network 2 in 1988 (and then becoming RTÉ2 again in 2004), or Antenne 2 and FR3 becoming France 2 and France 3 respectively in 1992.
And I know TV channels and confections are not the same thing at all - but this rebrand even makes less sense than Opal Fruits and Marathon becoming Starburst and Snickers respectively...
If I were a betting person my money would be on this to fail and another relaunch at some point within the next few years. That could be anything from 6 months to 6 years. There are always some companies with more resources than sense and this lot seem to be one of them.
They'd be far better off evolving the current brand, giving each station a clear focus. I get the oddest feeling that the huge amount of repeats of repeats and blocks of 4 and 5 hours of the Chase and tipping point will return within months (if they disappear at all)
RTE2 becoming Network 2 was genius in 1988. Up to that point, RTE2 was a backwater of a channel that was hardly watched in multi-Channel homes. Switching Kids and Sports to the Channel grew the audience and presentation improved greatly. It also allowed RTE1 to have programmes aimed at adults between 4 and 6, At that time the only real competition for that audience was Channel 4, BBC1 and ITV had kids programmes and Neighbours/Home and away.
It also marked the start of a time in the station when presentation improved. I remember talking to someone that had to represent RTE at EBU meetings saying that the 1989 News presentation was the first time he wasn't embarrassed by what RTE were producing in their News studio. Many times in the 80's their presentation looked like something from the early 1960's.