BC
Blake Connolly
Founding member
Good point raised by John (sometime of this parish) here:
http://www.dirtyfeed.org/2017/05/mcdonalds-playout/
I've had to swap out ads within an hour of TX in the past and having to do it on the same day is a regular occurrence. Sometimes it might be because there's been a news event that makes running an ad seem in poor taste but more often than not it's because they've realised after delivering the copy that there's a typo in one of the captions or something like that. Happens all the time, so it's very odd that they claimed they couldn't pull it until after today.
I do know of one local TV channel which is left to run by itself for 12 hours (it only has a day shift) but that's a real rarity.
http://www.dirtyfeed.org/2017/05/mcdonalds-playout/
I've had to swap out ads within an hour of TX in the past and having to do it on the same day is a regular occurrence. Sometimes it might be because there's been a news event that makes running an ad seem in poor taste but more often than not it's because they've realised after delivering the copy that there's a typo in one of the captions or something like that. Happens all the time, so it's very odd that they claimed they couldn't pull it until after today.
I do know of one local TV channel which is left to run by itself for 12 hours (it only has a day shift) but that's a real rarity.
SL
Remove McDonalds from the end and it could have quite easily been a John Lewis Christmas Advert. Which, I'm sure, no one would have batted an eyelid.
MY
That's probably because it was using the very real prospect of death affecting a family to advertise the need for life insurance as opposed to a filet-o-fish.
I always thought this advert was quite crass but I don't think it got complaints.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4ryy5q7zHpE
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4ryy5q7zHpE
That's probably because it was using the very real prospect of death affecting a family to advertise the need for life insurance as opposed to a filet-o-fish.
JA
I can remember the advert for, I think, Wrigley's Extra, with a dog climbing out of a man's mouth which was quite disgusting. That one got banned too.
I sometimes think these adverts that get banned are deliberately made to get banned- the attention it gets means it gets noticed more than a normal advert would.
I sometimes think these adverts that get banned are deliberately made to get banned- the attention it gets means it gets noticed more than a normal advert would.
VM
That's probably because it was using the very real prospect of death affecting a family to advertise the need for life insurance as opposed to a filet-o-fish.
Regardless, it's still using emotional manipulation to sell you a product.
I always thought this advert was quite crass but I don't think it got complaints.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4ryy5q7zHpE
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4ryy5q7zHpE
That's probably because it was using the very real prospect of death affecting a family to advertise the need for life insurance as opposed to a filet-o-fish.
Regardless, it's still using emotional manipulation to sell you a product.
ET
You see, this is another case of people being offended by an advert just because it deals with a controversial subject. Although it does exploit this situation a bit. More recent ads that have got complaints were Pepsi (remember all of that drama surrounding the ad) and Durex (for obvious reasons).
LL
London Lite
Founding member
Surely it's a case of job done for McDonalds? The advert got a lot of publicity for the brand in other media outlets.
IS
I think that sort of publicity works well if it's something new that no one has heard of but I don't think it will encourage people to suddenly want to go to McDonald's
Surely it's a case of job done for McDonalds? The advert got a lot of publicity for the brand in other media outlets.
I think that sort of publicity works well if it's something new that no one has heard of but I don't think it will encourage people to suddenly want to go to McDonald's
HA
Can anyone (especially the admin) please change the title to "Ill-thought adverts". The description should be "Adverts in bad taste". We're talking about
bad taste adverts
, not
advents
.