TV Home Forum

If YOU were the boss of ITV...?

(January 2006)

This site closed in March 2021 and is now a read-only archive
AM
amosc100
With regards to the pension fund - firstly I would, like all other companies are doing at the moment, close the final salary pension scheme (save money!!!!). There is no going back to the regions it would no cost far too much money, but would help to create greater ties between ITVplc and the remaining independent ITV licence holders.

With regards to advertising, I would go back to 2 commercial breaks within a 60 minute programme (or 1 commercial break during a 60 minute documentary/current affair programme) and reduce the air-time of commercials to only 3 minutes, instead of 4. This in turn would create less commercial space therefore more competiton for the slots hence an increase in airtime price (in theory!).

With regards to the ITV network - keep ITV1 as a general entertainment network, make ITV2 a more accessible more uk produced channel and make it a second entertainment network (although with a spluttering of more recent programmes i.e. 1-5 yr old). ITV3 would go back to complete basics and just show programmes that are 5years or older. ITV4 would become 24 hour station and merge it with ITV Men and Motors. The fifth channel would become between 0600 and 1900 CiTVC and then between 1900 and 0600 become the upcoming ITV Play.

All sport programmes would be plit across ITV1 and ITV2 ONLY. ITV2 would gain its own news programmes. ITV2 would become a 24 hour channel with GMTV co-operating it demise of its second station to allow for 24 hours. GMTV's programmes would then be simulcast on ITV2 or shown at a later time. The children's programmes on GMTV2 would then be shown on CiTVC. Each ITV station would have its own controller with their own budget - but the biggest slices of the budget would go to both ITv1 and ITV2.

More money would go towards creating brainstorming teams for comedy, drama, and factual/documentaries and then this would be followed by a greater increase in feasability studies with the public so that only the more popular programmes would make it to the screen.

Create greater co-productions with the help of Granada USA, Granada Australia and Granada Germany and with the many independent producers.

Although more money will be spent in the research/development stages of programme producing there would be more rewards with regards to overseas sales (again, in theory) and with the advertisers with their specfic targets.

Above all I would provide money for all areas of broadcasting so that people can grow, and live, with the ITV network instead of just aiming at one part of the population, who are not really that bothered anyway - the 18-35 year olds!
PA
pad
amosc100 posted:
With regards to advertising, I would go back to 2 commercial breaks within a 60 minute programme (or 1 commercial break during a 60 minute documentary/current affair programme) and reduce the air-time of commercials to only 3 minutes, instead of 4. This in turn would create less commercial space therefore more competiton for the slots hence an increase in airtime price (in theory!).


This would never happen and would also be a terrible move if decided upon. I would however opt for US-style advert structures.
CO
Conan-san
I think there's some Ofcom rulling banning the US style advertising system...

In anycase, If I was wearing the leader pants, the first thing to happen is for all the relality shizen to be canceled, then ITV would advertise it's self as the real alternitve to such. (Complelte with cool adverts that compare borring reality tv whith the stuff that's on ITV).

Also, To combat Dr Who, Rerun of New Captain Scarlet, besides, no one saw it on MOM so it's practiacly new anyway.

And finaly, CITV, that's geting a majour hall up the backside, in vision programing, relevent advertising (and the ocasional health bit Wink ), a better selection of imports (Out goes Shuriken School and Domo Agriato, mr Naruto...)
and basicly everything will sort it's self out from there.
JB
JosephB
0530 ITV Morning News
0600 GMTV Newshour
0700 GMTV Today with Andrew and Kate
0845 LK Today with Lorraine, Friday Ent Today with Ben and Jen
0945 New Talk Show
1015 This Morning
1215 Regional News
1230 ITV News
1300 Des and Mel
1400 As normal
1500 ITV News
1505 Regional News
1510 CITV
1630 I Want that House
1700 Jeremy Kyle Show
1800 ITV News
1830 Regional News
1900 Emmerdale
1930 Coronation Street
2000 Trevor McDonald/Bill/Film or Drama/Bill/Trevor McDonald or Drama
2030 Drama/Bill/Film or Drama/Bill/Drama
2100 Drama/Fact. Ent/Film or Drama/Fact. Ent or Drama/Drama
2200 ITV News at Ten
TV
tvarksouthwest
pad posted:
amosc100 posted:
With regards to advertising, I would go back to 2 commercial breaks within a 60 minute programme (or 1 commercial break during a 60 minute documentary/current affair programme) and reduce the air-time of commercials to only 3 minutes, instead of 4. This in turn would create less commercial space therefore more competiton for the slots hence an increase in airtime price (in theory!).


This would never happen and would also be a terrible move if decided upon. I would however opt for US-style advert structures.

Only for the broadcasters. Viewers would welcome it.
DB
dbl
pad posted:


This would never happen and would also be a terrible move if decided upon. I would however opt for US-style advert structures.

I hope you pulling my leg, that would be terrible.
AM
amosc100
This would never happen and would also be a terrible move if decided upon. I would however opt for US-style advert structures.[/quote]

so what you are saying is that you would show the start of the programme then the programme sequence then straight into a commercial break, have another commercial break about every 10 mins and then... after the programme has finished and just before the end caps have another commercial break. NO WAY!!!!!!!!! Not only does it look extremely poor on screen the viewers also take a total dislike to it (for example when The Sci-FI Channel started, here in the UK - before it was taken over by Flextech - it had the US style advertising slots but they got very bad publicity and they soon followed every other channel by introducing UK style commercial breaks).
RO
routemarker
amosc100 posted:

so what you are saying is that you would show the start of the programme then the programme sequence then straight into a commercial break, have another commercial break about every 10 mins and then... after the programme has finished and just before the end caps have another commercial break. NO WAY!!!!!!!!! Not only does it look extremely poor on screen the viewers also take a total dislike to it (for example when The Sci-FI Channel started, here in the UK - before it was taken over by Flextech - it had the US style advertising slots but they got very bad publicity and they soon followed every other channel by introducing UK style commercial breaks).


Well they dont need to do that, networks can play through to the second act of US shows like they do here in Australia and take a break at a scene change. Also many of the US networks have gone to a 6 act hour meaning that they no longer take a break between the show and credits - they have moved that break within the show. To create flow ,next week trailers are played along with the credits and once that ends the next show starts straight away, without a break.

If i were the boss of ITV i would pressure Ofcom to drop this silly 3 internal breaks/hr and one between programs for the US/Australian method. To adopt something as trivial as 2 breaks/hr will kill the company, you would be hard pressed to sell the advert time for the middle of such huge ad breaks for a premium price when they are generally the lowest point of the broadcast.

Also the ECP would be redesigned and will not be done live. Credits would go on the lower quarter of the screen with next time episode trailers or promos played above witht he next show starting straight away.

The UK has such a huge TV viewing audience, why the hell are such old policies still in place that would be more suited for tiny countries like iceland. It's time to move into the 21st centrury.
AM
amosc100
routemarker posted:
amosc100 posted:

so what you are saying is that you would show the start of the programme then the programme sequence then straight into a commercial break, have another commercial break about every 10 mins and then... after the programme has finished and just before the end caps have another commercial break. NO WAY!!!!!!!!! Not only does it look extremely poor on screen the viewers also take a total dislike to it (for example when The Sci-FI Channel started, here in the UK - before it was taken over by Flextech - it had the US style advertising slots but they got very bad publicity and they soon followed every other channel by introducing UK style commercial breaks).


Well they dont need to do that, networks can play through to the second act of US shows like they do here in Australia and take a break at a scene change. Also many of the US networks have gone to a 6 act hour meaning that they no longer take a break between the show and credits - they have moved that break within the show. To create flow ,next week trailers are played along with the credits and once that ends the next show starts straight away, without a break.

If i were the boss of ITV i would pressure Ofcom to drop this silly 3 internal breaks/hr and one between programs for the US/Australian method. To adopt something as trivial as 2 breaks/hr will kill the company, you would be hard pressed to sell the advert time for the middle of such huge ad breaks for a premium price when they are generally the lowest point of the broadcast.

Also the ECP would be redesigned and will not be done live. Credits would go on the lower quarter of the screen with next time episode trailers or promos played above witht he next show starting straight away.

The UK has such a huge TV viewing audience, why the hell are such old policies still in place that would be more suited for tiny countries like iceland. It's time to move into the 21st centrury.


More commercial breaks with more commercials does not necessarily mean more money - it leads to dilution. Don't forget the price of advertising is actually falling here in the UK, mainly due to the fact that we have so many channels.

If the programmes is popular, has the viewers and is very constant within a ratings range then the problem of advertising disappears due the fact that advertisers WILL want to reach that audience, thus if the number of commercials are limited companies WILL pay more. The same also goes with sponsors. Do you think that Cadbury/Schweppes would have stuck with Coronation Street for over 10 years if it didn't reachj its audience with every episode.

The only fall down here, which happens now, anyway, is when a programme receives low viewing figures (such as regional programming) then the price for adverts is much lower just to gain some sort of profit for that time slot. But if more commercial breaks were introduced during the time slot do you think that advertising revenue would increase - it wouldnm't it would either stay constant as it now, or even worse it would actually drop further.

Hence the reason as to why ITV are trying to create as many popular/ratings grabbing programmes as possible so that they can sell the air-time at a decent price. Prudence here, though, must outweigh money grabbing. If less commercials are shown during the most popular programmes then more money will be made - a reverse psychology effect!!!!!!!
RO
routemarker
amosc100 posted:
More commercial breaks with more commercials does not necessarily mean more money - it leads to dilution. Don't forget the price of advertising is actually falling here in the UK, mainly due to the fact that we have so many channels.

If the programmes is popular, has the viewers and is very constant within a ratings range then the problem of advertising disappears due the fact that advertisers WILL want to reach that audience, thus if the number of commercials are limited companies WILL pay more. The same also goes with sponsors. Do you think that Cadbury/Schweppes would have stuck with Coronation Street for over 10 years if it didn't reachj its audience with every episode.

The only fall down here, which happens now, anyway, is when a programme receives low viewing figures (such as regional programming) then the price for adverts is much lower just to gain some sort of profit for that time slot. But if more commercial breaks were introduced during the time slot do you think that advertising revenue would increase - it wouldnm't it would either stay constant as it now, or even worse it would actually drop further.

Hence the reason as to why ITV are trying to create as many popular/ratings grabbing programmes as possible so that they can sell the air-time at a decent price. Prudence here, though, must outweigh money grabbing. If less commercials are shown during the most popular programmes then more money will be made - a reverse psychology effect!!!!!!!


Well you wouldn't be playing more commercials, you would have the same amount. Now that there are more breaks, the length of the breaks will be significantly shorter. If there are shorter the chances of viewers watching every advert increase. With huge ad breaks the ads near the start and the end are usually sold at premium (ie sponsors). The middle part of the break will experience a drop in ratings and thus a lower audience. You don't think the first and and the 9th ad in a break are sold at the same price do you?

Also by eliminating breaks between shows (esp in prime time) you increase audience flow between those shows to keep that lead in, allowing networks to greate very strong blocks of programming.

Newer posts