NB
I'll admit I have seen few episodes in recent years but to say it has vastly improved is ridiculous. I knew it was in a very bad way but until that chimps programme last year I didn't know how bad. It not only contained no science, it actively set out to show up scientists as stuffy and close-minded when it was quite obviously not the case. By beginning with such a awful hypothesis as "chimps are people too" it was hard to take seriously from the title alone.
I know this is only one example from the new look but I wouldn't want to waste my time on the piffle again, especially after reading reviews of the latest batch which seem to confirm my worries.This is a show that used to have interviews with Richard Feynman, now it has a comedian dicking around trying to be clever (and failing badly). See http://asadodo.blogspot.com/2006/10/intelligent-science-programmes-on.html, http://www.theregister.co.uk/2006/11/09/horizon/ and www.theregister.co.uk/2006/11/04/bbc_horizon_letters/ for more rants.
I can only think of the Sky at Night as the only programme that still contains traces of science on television anymore, probably since the format hasn't changed in half a century.
Try the excellent http://badscience.net for more on things like this.
P.S I did like the piano jingle and desert titles though!
Tiger2000 posted:
I totally dissagree, after a few years in the doldrums, Horizon has vastly improved over the past couple of years, now in it's 44th Series, long may it continue.
I'll admit I have seen few episodes in recent years but to say it has vastly improved is ridiculous. I knew it was in a very bad way but until that chimps programme last year I didn't know how bad. It not only contained no science, it actively set out to show up scientists as stuffy and close-minded when it was quite obviously not the case. By beginning with such a awful hypothesis as "chimps are people too" it was hard to take seriously from the title alone.
I know this is only one example from the new look but I wouldn't want to waste my time on the piffle again, especially after reading reviews of the latest batch which seem to confirm my worries.This is a show that used to have interviews with Richard Feynman, now it has a comedian dicking around trying to be clever (and failing badly). See http://asadodo.blogspot.com/2006/10/intelligent-science-programmes-on.html, http://www.theregister.co.uk/2006/11/09/horizon/ and www.theregister.co.uk/2006/11/04/bbc_horizon_letters/ for more rants.
I can only think of the Sky at Night as the only programme that still contains traces of science on television anymore, probably since the format hasn't changed in half a century.
Try the excellent http://badscience.net for more on things like this.
P.S I did like the piano jingle and desert titles though!